Spring-Locked Sealing Flap Closure for Drywall Inspection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing closure devices for sealing flaps, particularly in drywall constructions, fail to provide reliable and stable locking under high loadings, which is essential for enhanced fire protection and operational reliability.

Innovation Solution

A closure device with a lock element that uses a spring mechanism to automatically latch and unlatch, featuring a latching jaw with a pawl region for secure locking and a run-off flank for effortless transition to a non-blocking position, allowing for reliable sealing and easy operation even under high loads.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a simple spring mechanism is used for latching and unlatching, then the device complexity is reduced and ease of operation is improved, but the reliability and stability under high loadings deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelatching and unlatching operationVSAvoidlocking stability under high loading
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The lock element is designed to dynamically change its functional state based on position: in the closed position it provides stable locking through a latching jaw with pawl region, while in the open position it rotates to a non-blocking state. This dynamic adaptation allows the simple spring mechanism to achieve both ease of operation and reliability under high loading.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The lock element's orientation parameter changes between two distinct states: locked and non-blocking. By rotating the lock element about its shaft, the system changes the spatial parameter of the locking surface, enabling the same component to provide both secure locking when closed and easy opening when forced, thereby resolving the contradiction between reliability and ease of operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of operation

If the lock element is designed to automatically latch under spring action, then the ease of operation is improved, but the device complexity increases due to additional guiding mechanisms

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomatic latchingVSAvoidguiding and entry mechanisms
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The guiding function for the lock element's movement is merged with the locking function itself. The latching jaw with its specific geometry serves dual purposes: it guides the lock element into the correct position during closing and simultaneously provides the locking action. This merging eliminates the need for separate guiding mechanisms, achieving automatic latching without excessive complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The lock element performs its own guiding and positioning functions through its inherent geometry and the spring's action. The pawl region and run-off flank are self-configuring features that automatically guide the lock element into the locked position without requiring external guiding mechanisms, thereby achieving ease of operation with minimal added complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Reliability

If the lock element requires forcible movement to reach non-blocking position, then the reliability of locked position is improved, but the ease of operation for opening deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelocked position stabilityVSAvoidopening operation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The opening operation follows a periodic sequence: initial forcible movement to overcome the locked position, followed by automatic spring-driven rotation to the non-blocking state. This periodic action ensures that the reliable locked position is maintained during normal operation, while the opening process, though requiring initial force, automatically completes without continuous effort, balancing reliability with operational feasibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution ensures stable and secure closure of sealing flaps, meeting enhanced fire protection regulations and allowing for easy operation by automatically switching between locking and non-blocking positions, ensuring the closure device functions reliably under various conditions.

Implementation Method 1

lock element (6) that can be locked on a mating piece (3), in particular an inspection flap, preferably in a drywall construction, in particular for a wall or a ceiling

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpring force: Spring

Data Source

PatentUS11814885B2Closure device, preferably for closing a sealing flap of an opening
Publication Date: 2023.11.14 KNAUF GIPS KG
  • US11814885B2 patent drawing
  • US11814885B2 patent drawing
  • US11814885B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A closure device having a lock element that can be locked on a mating piece, preferably for closing a sealing flap of an opening, in particular an inspection flap, preferably in a drywall construction, in particular for a wall or a ceiling is provided.A closure device is distinguished by the fact that the lock element is arranged in such a way that, preferably under the action of a spring, in a first position with respect to the mating piece it is or can be moved into a locking position and, in a second position, it reaches a position and/or a state without any blocking action.