Spring Retainer Seal for Aviation Fire Zones

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing fire seals in aviation face challenges in maintaining sealing capability under high pressure and exposure to direct flames, particularly larger seals which require increased force and are prone to instability, making it difficult to maintain a fire-resistant barrier.

Innovation Solution

A system comprising a bulb seal integrated with an elastomer backing and a metal feathered spring retainer that biases the seal, accommodating deflections and shielding it from fire and high-pressure zones, while minimizing closing forces and maintaining compression within a predetermined range.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Area of stationary object

If the size (diameter) of a seal increases to cover larger fire zones, then the sealing area is improved, but the force required to compress the seal increases and stability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesealing areaVSAvoidcompression force
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The seal is divided into multiple segments or fingers that can independently deflect and compress. This segmentation allows each segment to handle a portion of the total sealing requirement, reducing the force needed per segment while maintaining overall sealing effectiveness across large areas.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The seal design incorporates dynamic elements that allow the seal to adapt its compression force based on local conditions. The seal can deflect and redistribute forces dynamically, ensuring stable performance across varying sizes without requiring proportionally increasing compression force.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Area of stationary object

If the size (diameter) of a seal increases to cover larger fire zones, then the sealing area is improved, but the stability of the seal deteriorates due to increased risk of folding over

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesealing areaVSAvoidseal stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

By dividing the seal into multiple stable segments, each segment maintains structural integrity independently. This prevents the entire large seal from folding over, as each smaller segment remains stable even when the overall seal spans large areas.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The seal utilizes flexible shell structures that can bend and conform to irregular surfaces while maintaining stability. This flexibility allows the seal to cover large areas without rigid structures that would be prone to folding, enabling stable performance across varying sizes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

3Reliability

If the compression force on the seal is increased to maintain sealing capability under high pressure, then the sealing effectiveness is improved, but the risk of seal failure under direct flame and high pressure increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesealing capabilityVSAvoidfire and pressure exposure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The seal design incorporates cushioning elements and stress-distributing features that protect the seal from concentrated forces. This beforehand cushioning allows the seal to withstand high pressure and thermal exposure without requiring excessive compression force, reducing the risk of failure under extreme conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

Solution Approach 2:

The seal utilizes composite material structures combining materials with different properties (e.g., fire-resistant materials, flexible materials, heat-resistant materials). This composite construction maintains sealing capability under high pressure and temperature while protecting against fire and pressure damage without requiring increased compression force.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system effectively isolates fire and high-pressure zones from non-fire and low-pressure zones, reducing the risk of seal failure and maintaining sealing capability under challenging conditions without increasing the applied force or seal size.

Implementation Method 1

a flexible spring retainer coupled to the seal that is configured to bias the seal

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

the spring retainer is configured to substantially shield the seal from the at least one of the fire zone and the high-pressure zone

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhysical barrier: Physical Containment

Data Source

PatentUS10502320B2Spring retainer seal
Publication Date: 2019.12.10 ROHR INC
  • US10502320B2 patent drawing
  • US10502320B2 patent drawing
  • US10502320B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Aspects of the disclosure are directed to a system for isolating at least one of a fire zone and a high-pressure zone from at least one of a non-fire zone and a low-pressure zone, comprising a seal and a flexible spring retainer coupled to the seal that is configured to bias the seal. The biasing may be based in terms of a compression of the seal within a predetermined range of compression. A shielding of the seal from the at least one of the fire zone and the high-pressure zone may be provided.