Spring Sensor Element with Varying Height CNT Blocks

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing spring sensor elements using carbon nanotubes face limitations in measurement sensitivity and manufacturing complexity due to the requirement of uniform CNT block lengths and vertical alignment, which restricts their ability to detect small forces and accelerations accurately.

Innovation Solution

A spring sensor element with carbon nanotubes arranged in CNT blocks of varying heights, where at least one block is positioned near electric contacts, allowing for greater deflection and sensitivity without the need for separate spring elements, enabling the detection of both vertical and horizontal force components with improved reproducibility.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If carbon nanotubes are arranged in uniform vertical blocks, then manufacturing is simplified, but measurement sensitivity is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing simplicityVSAvoidmeasurement sensitivity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The CNT blocks are segmented into different height levels (first level with height H1, second level with height H2 where H1 > H2), allowing the sensor to achieve high measurement sensitivity through varied deflection responses while maintaining a structured, manufacturable block configuration

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different regions of the sensor have different CNT block heights tailored to specific measurement needs. The taller blocks provide greater deflection and sensitivity in specific areas, while shorter blocks provide stability, creating local quality variations that optimize overall sensor performance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Stability of the object's composition

If carbon nanotubes are arranged in blocks of the same length, then structural uniformity is achieved, but maximum deflection is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural uniformityVSAvoidmaximum deflection
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSLength of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The uniform structure is segmented into different height levels, with taller blocks (H1) providing greater deflection capability and shorter blocks (H2) providing structural stability, thereby achieving both maximum deflection and structural uniformity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Ease of manufacture

If vertical CNT blocks are used, then manufacturing is simplified, but permanent contact with neighboring blocks occurs under compression

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing simplicityVSAvoidmeasurement reproducibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The sensor uses asymmetric block height arrangement where taller blocks (H1) are strategically positioned to bear compressive loads without contacting neighboring blocks, while shorter blocks (H2) provide spacing that prevents permanent contact, thereby improving measurement reproducibility

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

The solution moves from a single-height dimension to a two-level height dimension (H1 and H2), using the vertical dimension strategically to prevent block contact while maintaining manufacturing simplicity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution enhances measurement sensitivity and precision, allowing for the detection of small forces and accelerations with high spatial resolution and reliability, while simplifying the manufacturing process by eliminating the need for precise alignment and reducing the risk of permanent contact between CNT blocks.

Implementation Method 1

The deformation of the sensor element and thus the deformation of the spring sensor element as a whole can be determined by measuring this resistance

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPiezoresistive effect: Piezoresistive Effect

Implementation Method 2

a movement of the spring element leads to a deformation of the spring sensor element. Therefore, there are variations in the electric conductivity and/or the electric resistance of this sensor element

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrical conductivity change under stress: Electrical Resistance

Data Source

PatentUS10444084B2Spring sensor element having carbon nanotubes
Publication Date: 2019.10.15 TECH UNIV DARMSTADT
  • US10444084B2 patent drawing
  • US10444084B2 patent drawing
  • US10444084B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The subject of the invention is a spring sensor element 1, comprising carbon nanotubes 6 on a carrier 2, wherein the carbon nanotubes 6 are arranged in CNT blocks 10, 20, 30, 40, wherein the carbon nanotubes 6 of each CNT block 10, 20, 30, 40 preferably have the same length and the same alignment with respect to the carrier 2, wherein at least the highest one of the CNT blocks 10, 20, 30, 40 is arranged nearby at least two electric contacts 60, 61, 62. The spring sensor element 1 has at least one additional neighboring CNT block 20, 30, 40 of the height H2 in addition to the first CNT block 10 of the height H1, wherein the heights H1 and H2 differ by a factor of at least 2.