Spring Steel Microstructure Control for Delayed Fracture Resistance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing high-strength spring steel for suspension systems in automobiles faces challenges in achieving both high tensile strength and delayed fracture resistance while maintaining cold formability, often requiring the addition of expensive alloy elements.

Innovation Solution

The development of spring steel with controlled crystal orientations of martensite structures, specifically by hot rolling and tempering, to enhance both delayed fracture resistance and cold formability without the need for expensive alloy elements, achieving a tensile strength of 1800 MPa or more.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If high strength spring steel is made by adding alloy elements such as Ni or Cu, then delayed fracture resistance is improved, but cost rises

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedelayed fracture resistanceVSAvoidcost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the microstructural parameters of the steel by controlling crystal orientations of martensite structures. Specifically, it increases the fraction of <100> orientations and suppresses <111> orientations through controlled hot rolling and tempering processes, achieving improved delayed fracture resistance without adding expensive alloy elements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The invention replaces expensive alloy elements (Ni, Cu, V, Mo) with a cost-effective microstructural control approach using standard hot rolling and tempering processes. This achieves the same functional improvement (delayed fracture resistance) through process control rather than material composition changes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

2Reliability

If high strength spring steel is made by adding alloy elements such as V or Mo, then delayed fracture resistance is improved by forming precipitates, but cost rises

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedelayed fracture resistanceVSAvoidcost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of adding alloy elements to form precipitates, the invention changes the crystal orientation parameters of existing martensite structures. The controlled hot rolling and tempering processes produce a specific texture with increased <100> orientations that provides hydrogen trapping capability without requiring additional alloying elements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Strength

If the strength of spring steel is raised to 1800 MPa or more, then tensile strength is improved, but sensitivity to hydrogen penetration and corrosion pits increases, making the spring liable to break due to delayed fracture

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetensile strengthVSAvoiddelayed fracture resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the crystallographic orientation parameters of martensite structures to simultaneously achieve high tensile strength and delayed fracture resistance. The specific texture control (increasing <100> and suppressing <111> orientations) creates a microstructure that is both strong and resistant to hydrogen embrittlement

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The invention creates a composite-like microstructure within the martensite phase by establishing a specific distribution of crystal orientations. This textured microstructure exhibits combined properties of high strength and high delayed fracture resistance, similar to how composite materials combine different phases to achieve superior properties

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

4Reliability

If alloy elements are added to improve delayed fracture resistance, then critical hydrogen content is increased, but cold formability is not improved

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedelayed fracture resistanceVSAvoidcold formability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the crystal orientation parameters of martensite structures, which simultaneously affects both delayed fracture resistance and cold formability. The increased <100> orientations provide both hydrogen trapping capability and improved ductility, unlike alloy element addition which only addresses hydrogen resistance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach results in spring steel with improved tensile strength, delayed fracture resistance, and cold formability, enabling the production of lightweight suspension springs for automobiles without the use of costly alloy elements.

Implementation Method 1

90% or more of the metal microstructures by area fraction is tempered martensite

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMartensitic transformation: Phase Change

Implementation Method 2

stretching of the prior austenite grains at the surface in the rolling direction

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPlastic deformation: Plasticity

Implementation Method 3

quench hardening it

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRapid cooling: Cooling

Implementation Method 4

tempering it

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat treatment: Heat Treatment

Data Source

PatentEP3330399B1Steel for suspension spring and method for manufacturing same
Publication Date: 2020.03.25 NIPPON STEEL CORPORATION
  • EP3330399B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3330399B1 patent drawing
  • EP3330399B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Provided is spring steel for suspension suppressing or not requiring addition of expensive alloy elements, having a large tensile strength, and excellent in cold formability and delay fracture resistance, wherein at a cross-section parallel to a rolling direction, 90% or more of the metal microstructures by area fraction is tempered martensite, and at a cross-section parallel to the rolling direction, in a range of 10% of diameter or thickness from the surface, a ratio of a length in a long axis direction of prior austenite grains and a length in a direction perpendicular to the long axis direction of the prior austenite grains is 1.5 or more and a ratio of &lt;011&gt; fraction/&lt;111&gt; fraction of martensite texture as seen from the rolling direction is 3.0 or more.