Spring Member Test Apparatus with Combined Vertical and Torsional Loading

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing analytical methods and testing systems for vehicle suspension spring members primarily account for vertical loading, neglecting the impact of torsional loading, which can contribute to operational failure.

Innovation Solution

A testing apparatus that applies both translational and torsional loading to a spring member, using a vertical force actuator mechanism and a torque actuator mechanism, respectively, to simulate the complex loading conditions experienced by spring members in vehicle suspension systems.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If only vertical loading is applied to the spring member during testing, then the testing system is simpler, but the reliability of the test results is reduced because torsional loading effects are not captured

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetest result reliabilityVSAvoidtesting system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The testing apparatus is divided into two independent loading mechanisms: a vertical loading mechanism for applying vertical forces and a torsional loading mechanism for applying rotational moments. This segmentation allows each mechanism to be optimized for its specific function while collectively providing comprehensive loading capabilities, thereby improving test result reliability without excessive complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The testing apparatus is designed as a multi-functional system that can apply both vertical and torsional loads simultaneously or independently. The universal design allows the same apparatus to test spring members under various loading conditions (vertical only, torsional only, or combined), making it adaptable to different test requirements while maintaining comprehensive loading capabilities

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Reliability

If both translational and torsional loading mechanisms are included in the apparatus, then the simulation of operational forces is more accurate, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimulation accuracyVSAvoidapparatus complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The apparatus uses intermediate transmission elements such as linkages, arms, and mechanical advantage systems to transfer forces from the actuators to the spring member. These intermediaries enable the conversion of linear actuator motion into the required vertical and torsional loading patterns, achieving accurate operational force simulation while managing the complexity through proven mechanical transmission principles

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The loading mechanisms are designed to enable independent adjustment of loading parameters including force magnitude, rotation angle, and application rate. This parameter variability allows the apparatus to simulate different operational conditions and failure scenarios, improving simulation accuracy while maintaining flexibility that reduces the need for multiple specialized devices

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Area of stationary object

If the first and second mechanisms are positioned closer together, then the apparatus footprint is reduced, but interference between mechanisms during operation increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveapparatus footprintVSAvoidmechanism interference
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The first and second mechanisms are positioned asymmetrically relative to the spring member, with each mechanism approaching from a different direction and plane. This asymmetric arrangement allows the mechanisms to operate in largely independent spatial zones, minimizing interference while maintaining a compact overall footprint. The vertical mechanism operates primarily in the vertical plane while the torsional mechanism operates in the horizontal plane

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

The mechanisms are arranged to operate in different spatial dimensions: the vertical loading mechanism applies forces primarily in the vertical dimension, while the torsional loading mechanism applies moments in the horizontal rotational dimension. This dimensional separation allows compact positioning without significant interference, as each mechanism's motion path occupies a different spatial domain

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Data Source

PatentUS8230733B2Spring member test apparatus
Publication Date: 2012.07.31 FORD GLOBAL TECH LLC
  • US8230733B2 patent drawing
  • US8230733B2 patent drawing
  • US8230733B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An apparatus is provided for loading a spring member secured on the apparatus. The apparatus includes a first mechanism for applying a translational loading to the spring member, and a second mechanism for applying a torsional loading to the spring member. The first mechanism includes a plurality of first elements, and the second mechanism includes a plurality of second elements. Each first element of the plurality of first elements is physically spaced apart from each second element of the plurality of second elements to aid in preventing interference between the first and second mechanisms during operation of the first and second mechanisms.