Spring Tine Harrow with Dynamic Depth Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current weed harrowing apparatuses face challenges in controlling the working depth, which can result in damage to cultivated crops if too deep or inadequate weed control if too shallow, especially in fields with varying soil hardness.

Innovation Solution

A spring tine harrow with a sensor unit and actuator system that automatically adjusts the tine section's tilt in response to soil type changes, allowing for consistent working depth across different soil types by using a control module to compute mean tilt values and adjust fluid pressure in pneumatic or hydraulic cylinders.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the working depth of a weed harrow is increased to control seed weed more effectively, then weed control is improved, but the cultivated crop may be damaged

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveweed control effectivenessVSAvoidcrop damage
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by making the tine section tiltably attached to the carrying frame, allowing it to adjust its angle dynamically. The sensor unit continuously monitors the tilt angle and provides feedback to the control module, which adjusts the actuator to maintain optimal working depth. This dynamic adjustment enables the harrow to achieve sufficient working depth for effective weed control while preventing excessive depth that would damage crops.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback through the sensor unit that measures the tilt angle of the tine section and feeds this information to the control module. The control module compares the measured tilt angle with the desired working depth and adjusts the actuator accordingly. This closed-loop feedback system ensures the harrow maintains the optimal working depth to control weeds effectively without damaging the crop.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Object-affected harmful factors

If the working depth is reduced to protect the cultivated crop, then crop damage is minimized, but seed weed control becomes insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecrop damageVSAvoidweed control effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The tiltable tine section with dynamic angle adjustment allows the harrow to adapt to varying soil conditions and crop stages. The sensor unit continuously monitors the actual working depth and the control module adjusts the tilt angle to maintain the optimal depth for weed control while protecting the crop, resolving the contradiction between shallow and deep working depths.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The feedback mechanism through the sensor unit and control module ensures the harrow maintains the precise working depth needed for effective weed control. The system continuously monitors and adjusts the tine section angle to prevent both insufficient weed control and excessive crop damage, achieving the optimal balance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Device complexity

If a fixed working depth is used in fields with varying soil hardness, then the harrow structure remains simple, but effective weed control cannot be maintained across different soil types

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveharrow structure simplicityVSAvoidweed control consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms the fixed working depth design into a dynamic system where the tine section can adjust its angle in response to soil hardness variations. The sensor unit detects changes in working conditions and the control module adjusts the tilt angle accordingly, enabling consistent weed control across different soil types without requiring an overly complex structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the working parameter (tine section tilt angle) in response to varying soil hardness conditions. The sensor unit monitors the actual working depth and the control module adjusts the tilt angle parameter to maintain optimal working depth across different soil types, ensuring consistent weed control effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Device complexity

If manual adjustment of tine section tilt is used, then the device complexity is reduced, but the ability to automatically adapt to soil type changes is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol system simplicityVSAvoidsoil type adaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements self-service through the automated sensor-unit-and-control-module system that continuously monitors and adjusts the tine section tilt without manual intervention. The sensor unit detects soil type changes and working depth variations, and the control module automatically adjusts the actuator to maintain optimal conditions, enabling the harrow to adapt autonomously to varying soil types.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The feedback loop through the sensor unit and control module enables automatic adaptation to soil type changes. The sensor unit continuously measures the tilt angle and working depth, and the control module processes this information to adjust the actuator accordingly, allowing the harrow to self-regulate and adapt to different soil conditions without manual intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables precise and adaptive mechanical weed control, minimizing crop damage while effectively hindering seed weed growth regardless of soil type, by continuously monitoring and adjusting the tine depth to maintain optimal working conditions.

Implementation Method 1

Suitable types of sensor units may comprise a potentiometric position sensor, or a proximity sensor.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPotentiometric position sensing:

Implementation Method 2

the actuator means comprises a pneumatic or hydraulic cylinder adapted for tilting the tine section relative to the first carrying frame

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPneumatic pressure:

Implementation Method 3

the actuator means comprises a pneumatic or hydraulic cylinder adapted for tilting the tine section relative to the first carrying frame

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydraulic pressure:

Data Source

PatentEP3656195B1Method for mechanical weed control of a crop field, and a spring tine harrow for such method
Publication Date: 2023.01.04 BAWI TEC
  • EP3656195B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3656195B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3656195B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The present invention relates to a method for mechanical weed control of a crop field, and a spring tine harrow for such method.