Oscillating Sprinkler Head Recess Closure Design

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing square pop-up sprinklers face issues with incomplete opening or closing of the hinged lid due to vegetation, leading to potential incomplete closure and colonization by ants, as well as vulnerability to unauthorized operation by children.

Innovation Solution

The sprinkler head itself closes a recess in the cover surface, eliminating the need for lifting a cover and providing a more reliable closure, with the sprinkler head raised vertically by water pressure, reducing jet disturbances and allowing for adjustable jet patterns and protection against unauthorized operation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a hinged lid is used to cover the shaft opening, then the shaft can be closed when the sprinkler is at rest, but the lid cannot close completely due to vegetation interference

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclosure reliabilityVSAvoidvegetation interference
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The invention removes the hinged lid from the system and replaces it with a recess in the cover surface that is closed by the sprinkler head itself. This extracts the problematic closing mechanism that was susceptible to vegetation interference and replaces it with a passive recess design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The sprinkler head itself serves the dual function of both closing the recess when in the rest position and providing the spray function when activated. The sprinkler head's own structure is used to seal the opening, eliminating the need for a separate lid mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If a hinged lid is used to cover the shaft opening, then the shaft can be closed when the sprinkler is at rest, but the closing force is weak at positions opposite the hinge allowing ants to colonize

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclosure completenessVSAvoidclosing force distribution
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The hinged lid mechanism is completely removed and replaced with a recess design. This eliminates the fundamental flaw of uneven force distribution in hinged lids, as the recess design provides uniform closure around the entire perimeter without relying on hinge-based mechanical advantage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Ease of operation

If a hinged lid is used, then the shaft can be covered, but children can easily open it to change sprinkler settings

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccessibility for maintenanceVSAvoidprotection against unauthorized operation
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The recess in the cover surface acts as an intermediary barrier that allows the sprinkler head to seal the opening while preventing direct access to the sprinkler mechanism. The recess design maintains closure integrity while the sprinkler head's position controls access to adjustment features.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Productivity

If the sprinkler is operated lowered in a shaft housing, then it can be concealed, but jet disturbances occur due to surrounding plant growth

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespray pattern qualityVSAvoidplant growth interference
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The invention transitions the sprinkler operation from a lowered position within the shaft to a raised position above the cover surface. This dimensional change moves the spray mechanism out of the zone affected by surrounding vegetation, eliminating jet disturbances while maintaining the recessed closure design for aesthetic and protective purposes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution ensures reliable closure of the sprinkler head, reduces disturbances from surrounding vegetation, and protects against unauthorized changes, maintaining operational efficiency and safety.

Implementation Method 1

The sprinkler head is advantageously raised from the rest position to the operating position vertically above the cover surface, thereby avoiding or at least reducing jet disturbances by plant growth surrounding the shaft housing compared to square sprinklers operated lowered in a shaft housing. The sprinkler head is advantageously raised against a vertically restoring spring force under the effect of the water pressure applied to the square sprinkler.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectWater pressure: Pressure Increase

Implementation Method 2

The sprinkler head is advantageously raised against a vertically restoring spring force under the effect of the water pressure applied to the square sprinkler. When the water pressure is gone, the sprinkler is pulled down into the idle position by the vertically restoring spring force.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpring force: Spring

Data Source

PatentEP2651567B1Oscillating sprinkler arrangement
Publication Date: 2015.01.21 HUSQVARNA AB
  • EP2651567B1 patent drawingFigure 1~3
  • EP2651567B1 patent drawingFigure 4(A)~6

AI summary

The invention relates to an oscillating sprinkler arrangement comprising an oscillating sprinkler which is disposed in a shaft sunk in the ground, wherein the sprinkler head (RK), via a cutout (AU) in the cover surface (DF) of a cover (DE) which closes the shaft housing (SG) at the top, can be moved out of a lowered position into an operating position lying above the cover surface and back. For this purpose, in the lowered rest position of the oscillating sprinkler, the cutout in the cover surface is closed by the sprinkler head itself, which then forms a part of the upper face of the oscillating sprinkler arrangement with an outer surface having the nozzle arrangement (DA).