SPS Activation Detection Using Decoding Quality Metrics

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Wireless communication networks face issues with false detection of semi-persistent-scheduling (SPS) activation or release, leading to unnecessary resource usage and potential missed releases, due to interference and misinterpretation of downlink control channel signals.

Innovation Solution

A user equipment (UE) method and apparatus that detect conditions for SPS activation or release based on downlink transmissions, generate metrics, and determine valid SPS events by using decoding quality metrics and CRC failure analysis to avoid false detections, thereby implicitly declaring SPS release when necessary.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the UE detects SPS activation or release based on downlink transmission, then the UE can schedule data transmissions, but false detection may occur due to interference leading to unnecessary resource usage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata transmission schedulingVSAvoidSPS detection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms where the UE monitors downlink transmissions and provides feedback about detected SPS activations or releases. The base station receives this feedback and can adjust scheduling decisions accordingly, reducing false detections while maintaining efficient resource utilization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces direct mechanical detection of SPS signals with a more sophisticated electronic measurement and analysis system. The UE measures metrics such as reference signal received power (RSRP), signal-to-interference-plus-noise ratio (SINR), and other downlink transmission characteristics to determine whether an SPS activation or release is legitimate, substituting simple detection with analytical measurement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Speed

If the UE uses simple detection methods for SPS activation, then the detection process is fast, but false detection increases due to interference

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection speedVSAvoidfalse detection rate
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary actions by having the UE pre-configure multiple detection metrics and thresholds before actual SPS activation occurs. The UE prepares measurement configurations and analysis algorithms in advance, enabling fast yet accurate detection when SPS activation actually happens, avoiding false detections through pre-established validation criteria.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes detection parameters from simple binary detection to multi-parameter analysis. The UE monitors multiple parameters including RSRP, SINR, and other downlink transmission metrics simultaneously, changing the detection approach from single-point detection to multi-dimensional parameter analysis, which increases reliability without significantly impacting speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If the UE implicitly releases SPS based on detection, then resource allocation is optimized, but missed releases may occur leading to wasted resources

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource allocation efficiencyVSAvoidrelease detection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements beforehand cushioning by having the UE and base station establish redundant validation mechanisms before SPS release occurs. The system uses multiple confirmation steps and fallback procedures that ensure even if one detection mechanism fails, alternative mechanisms can prevent missed releases, cushioning against resource waste while maintaining efficient allocation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses feedback loops where the UE reports detected SPS releases to the base station, and the base station confirms or corrects these reports. This feedback mechanism ensures accurate release detection while optimizing resource allocation, preventing both false releases and missed releases through continuous verification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentEP3053398B1Defense against false detection of semi-persistent scheduling (SPS) activation or release
Publication Date: 2019.05.22 QUALCOMM INC
  • EP3053398B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3053398B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3053398B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

Certain aspects of the present disclosure provide techniques for defending against false semi-persistent scheduling (SPS) activation detection and/or missed SPS release. According to certain aspects, a user equipment (UE) may detect one or more conditions for a semi-persistent scheduling (SPS) activation or release are met based on a downlink transmission, generate one or more metrics related to downlink transmission, and determine a valid SPS activation or release has occurred if the one or more metrics satisfy one or more criteria. According to certain aspects, a UE may determine a valid semi-persistent scheduling (SPS) activation has occurred, detect a number of PDSCH CRC failures, and implicitly declare an SPS release based on the detection.