SPS Acknowledgment Feedback Scheduling in Unlicensed Spectrum

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing wireless communication systems face challenges in efficiently managing acknowledgment feedback for semi-persistent scheduling (SPS) configurations, particularly in unlicensed radio frequency spectrums, where non-numeric timelines for feedback reporting are desirable to enhance system performance and flexibility.

Innovation Solution

A method and apparatus for a user equipment (UE) to receive a semi-persistent scheduling configuration activated by downlink control information (DCI), which indicates non-numeric feedback timelines, and subsequent DCI transmissions providing feedback resources, allowing the UE to transmit acknowledgment feedback based on these resources.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a numeric feedback timeline is used for SPS acknowledgment feedback, then the feedback timing is fixed and predictable, but the scheduling flexibility is reduced and unnecessary uplink transmissions occur in shared/unlicensed spectrum

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescheduling flexibilityVSAvoidunnecessary uplink transmissions
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic feedback timeline indication where the base station can flexibly indicate the feedback timing through DCI fields rather than using a fixed numeric timeline. The UE determines feedback timing based on dynamic indications from the base station, allowing adaptation to actual downlink transmission timing and spectrum conditions, thereby eliminating unnecessary uplink transmissions in shared/unlicensed spectrum while maintaining predictable feedback delivery.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If acknowledgment feedback is transmitted for every SPS transmission, then decoding reliability is maintained, but uplink overhead and system resource consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedecoding reliabilityVSAvoiduplink overhead
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent enables the system to self-adjust feedback transmission based on actual needs. The base station monitors downlink transmission status and only triggers acknowledgment feedback when necessary by setting specific indicators in DCI. This self-service mechanism ensures decoding reliability is maintained only when needed, while avoiding unnecessary uplink overhead by suppressing redundant feedback transmissions in shared/unlicensed spectrum environments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Ease of operation

If a fixed feedback timeline is configured for SPS, then the UE can predict feedback timing, but the base station cannot adapt feedback timing to actual transmission conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveUE prediction capabilityVSAvoidbase station scheduling flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines preliminary configuration with dynamic indication. The base station pre-configures the UE with feedback timeline options and rules through RRC signaling, enabling the UE to predict general feedback timing patterns. Meanwhile, the base station retains the ability to dynamically adjust specific feedback timing through DCI indications based on actual transmission conditions, achieving both predictability and adaptability in the feedback mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS12634976B2Acknowledgment feedback for semi-persistent scheduling in wireless communications
Publication Date: 2026.05.19 QUALCOMM INC
  • US12634976B2 patent drawing
  • US12634976B2 patent drawing
  • US12634976B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods, systems, and devices for wireless communications are described in which a user equipment (UE) may be configured with one or more semi-persistent scheduling (SPS) configurations. A base station may transmit a first downlink control information (DCI) transmission to the UE that activates an SPS configuration, and the first DCI may indicate a non-numeric feedback timeline for reporting associated acknowledgment feedback. The base station may transmit a subsequent second DCI transmission that provides feedback resources, and the UE may receive the second DCI and identify timing and resources for SPS acknowledgment feedback based on the second DCI. The UE may then transmit the acknowledgment feedback for one or more SPS transmissions in the feedback resources that are indicated by the second DCI transmission.