Semi-Persistent Scheduling Resource Allocation for Varying Packet Sizes

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In wireless communication systems, semi-persistent scheduling (SPS) transmission faces inefficiencies when the size of user packets varies frequently, as SPS resource allocation may not accommodate the data needs, leading to a requirement for a method to configure additional resources for efficient data transmission.

Innovation Solution

A method and apparatus for configuring SPS resources and L1 control resources in user equipment (UE) to request additional resources when the SPS resource is insufficient, allowing for scheduling requests and dynamic allocation of resources for specific logical channels, particularly in V2X communication scenarios.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If semi-persistent scheduling resource allocation is used, then resource allocation efficiency is improved for periodic traffic, but the system cannot accommodate varying packet sizes effectively

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource allocation efficiencyVSAvoidaccommodation of varying packet sizes
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic resource allocation by allowing the UE to send scheduling requests when the pre-configured SPS resource is insufficient for the current packet size. The network then dynamically adjusts the resource allocation based on actual traffic needs, transforming the static SPS mechanism into a hybrid dynamic-semi-static system that adapts to varying packet sizes while maintaining the efficiency benefits of SPS for periodic traffic

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the resource allocation parameters dynamically by introducing scheduling requests that trigger network responses with adjusted resource configurations. When traffic volume exceeds the pre-configured SPS resource capacity, the system modifies resource parameters (such as resource blocks, time slots) through scheduling requests and grants, enabling adaptation to varying packet sizes while preserving SPS efficiency for normal periodic traffic

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If additional resources are allocated dynamically, then data transmission capability is improved for varying packet sizes, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata transmission capabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a self-service mechanism where the UE autonomously monitors its own buffer status and determines when additional resources are needed by comparing available SPS resources with pending data volume. The UE then autonomously sends scheduling requests without network intervention, and the network only intervenes when resource adjustment is actually needed, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining high data transmission capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent establishes a feedback loop where the UE reports scheduling requests based on its buffer status, and the network responds with resource allocation adjustments. This feedback mechanism enables the system to adapt to varying packet sizes efficiently while keeping complexity localized - the UE handles monitoring and request generation, while the network handles resource management decisions, distributing complexity rather than centralizing it

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Adaptability or versatility

If scheduling requests are implemented, then resource accommodation flexibility is improved, but signaling overhead increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource accommodation flexibilityVSAvoidsignaling overhead
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by implementing scheduling requests only when necessary - specifically when the UE determines that the pre-configured SPS resource cannot accommodate the available data for transmission. Instead of continuously signaling or using full dynamic scheduling for all transmissions, the system uses scheduling requests partially and only when resource insufficiency occurs, reducing signaling overhead while maintaining resource accommodation flexibility

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent leverages the periodic nature of SPS traffic patterns by configuring scheduling requests to be triggered periodically based on buffer status checks at each SPS transmission opportunity. Rather than using continuous or on-demand signaling for every possible resource adjustment, the system uses periodic buffer status reporting aligned with SPS intervals, reducing signaling overhead by exploiting the inherent periodicity of the traffic pattern

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Data Source

PatentUS11889539B2Method and apparatus for performing semi persistent scheduling transmission with scheduling request in wireless communication system
Publication Date: 2024.01.30 LG ELECTRONICS INC
  • US11889539B2 patent drawing
  • US11889539B2 patent drawing
  • US11889539B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A user equipment (UE) receives a grant on a semi-persistent scheduling (SPS) resource from an eNodeB (eNB). The UE determines that the SPS resource cannot accommodate an amount of data available for transmission for a specific logical channel. The UE transmits the SPS scheduling information for the specific logical channel to the eNB. The SPS scheduling information for the specific logical channel may be a scheduling request for the specific logical channel, and may be transmitted on an additional L1 control resource.