SPS Configuration Update Feedback Mechanism for Wireless Reliability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current wireless communication systems, particularly in 5G and LTE, face challenges in reliably updating semi-persistent scheduling (SPS) configurations over control channels, which can lead to communication failures in mission-critical environments like factory automation, where periodic updates are crucial for maintaining connectivity and data transmission reliability.

Innovation Solution

A method is introduced to enhance SPS configuration updates by determining SPS update resources based on configured periodicity, transmitting updates over control channels, and utilizing feedback mechanisms to confirm receipt of updates, allowing for retransmissions if necessary, thereby improving the reliability of SPS communications.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If SPS updates are transmitted over control channels without feedback confirmation, then the control channel load is reduced, but the reliability of SPS configuration updates deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol channel loadVSAvoidSPS update reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where the receiving device sends confirmation messages to the transmitting device to indicate successful reception of SPS updates. The transmitting device monitors for these feedback messages and performs retransmissions when feedback is not received, thereby ensuring reliable update delivery while maintaining efficient control channel utilization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Speed

If SPS updates are transmitted without retransmission capability, then the transmission speed is faster, but the communication reliability in mission-critical environments deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveupdate transmission speedVSAvoidcommunication reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs feedback-based retransmission where the transmitting device waits for confirmation from the receiving device. If feedback indicating successful reception is not received within a predetermined time period, the transmitting device automatically retransmits the SPS update, thus ensuring reliable delivery in mission-critical environments while maintaining efficient transmission speeds.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If feedback mechanisms are implemented for every SPS update, then the reliability of update delivery is improved, but the control channel overhead increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveupdate delivery reliabilityVSAvoidcontrol channel overhead
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms selectively rather than for every SPS update. The system monitors for feedback messages and only triggers retransmissions when feedback is not received, applying feedback action partially based on actual reception status. This approach ensures reliable delivery for critical updates while minimizing unnecessary control channel overhead.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS11304221B2Techniques for updating semi-persistent scheduling (SPS) configuration in wireless communications
Publication Date: 2022.04.12 QUALCOMM INC
  • US11304221B2 patent drawing
  • US11304221B2 patent drawing
  • US11304221B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Aspects described herein relate to reporting feedback for semi-persistent scheduling (SPS) configuration updates. SPS communications can be activated over SPS resources with an access point. SPS update resources related to a configured periodicity for receiving SPS updates to SPS resource grants over a control channel can be determined. It can also be determined whether a SPS update is received in the SPS update resources over the control channel. Feedback can be transmitted to the access point, where the feedback indicates whether the SPS update is received over the SPS update resources.