Square Baler Rotor Cutter with Active Drop Floor

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Agricultural balers, particularly large square balers, face issues with clogging at the rotor cutter assembly due to unpredictable crop flow caused by uneven crop density and moisture content, leading to operational interruptions and downtime.

Innovation Solution

A rotor cutter assembly with a movable cutter and adjustable frame assembly that can drop in response to high crop volume or pressure, allowing for easy maintenance and adjustment of the cutting position, coupled with sensors to monitor and adjust operating parameters to prevent clogging.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the cutter is fixed in position during operation, then the structural simplicity is maintained, but the risk of clogging increases due to inability to adjust to crop volume changes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclog preventionVSAvoidframe assembly structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The frame assembly is designed with movable components that allow the cutter to dynamically adjust its position relative to the rotor based on crop volume and density. The suspension assembly enables the frame to move vertically, maintaining optimal cutting clearance under varying operational conditions, thereby preventing clogs while adapting to real-time crop flow changes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The frame assembly is divided into movable and stationary portions, allowing selective movement of specific components. The suspension assembly connects the movable frame portion to the stationary structure, enabling independent adjustment of the cutter position while maintaining overall structural integrity. This segmentation allows the system to gain flexibility without compromising structural strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Ease of repair

If the cutter is made removable for maintenance, then the ease of repair is improved, but the structural complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecutter removalVSAvoidframe assembly structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of repairVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The frame assembly incorporates a maintenance position that is accessible and allows easy removal of the cutter. The movable nature of the frame enables the cutter to be detached without requiring disassembly of the entire rotor cutter assembly. This dynamic positioning capability simplifies maintenance operations while the modular design keeps the added complexity manageable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Adaptability or versatility

If the distance between cutter and rotor is fixed, then the manufacturing precision is maintained, but the adaptability to crop density changes is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecrop volume adjustmentVSAvoidcutting position accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

Sensors are integrated to monitor the distance between the cutter and rotor, providing real-time feedback on crop volume and density conditions. This feedback mechanism allows the suspension assembly to automatically adjust the frame position, maintaining optimal cutting clearance. The system continuously adapts to crop variations while preserving manufacturing precision through controlled, sensor-guided adjustments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from a static cutting gap to a dynamic one that automatically adjusts based on crop conditions. The suspension assembly enables the frame to move vertically in response to crop volume changes, maintaining consistent cutting performance. This dynamic adjustment preserves manufacturing precision by ensuring the cutter remains at the optimal distance from the rotor under varying operational conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Productivity

If sensors and automated adjustment are added, then the productivity is improved by preventing downtime, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontinuous operationVSAvoidcontrol system
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Sensors monitor crop volume and density, providing feedback to the control system that automatically adjusts the frame position. This closed-loop control prevents clogs before they occur, eliminating downtime and maintaining continuous operation. The automated adjustment reduces the need for manual intervention, significantly improving productivity despite the added complexity of the control system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs self-adjustment of the cutter position based on sensor input, eliminating the need for constant operator intervention. The automated feedback mechanism allows the rotor cutter assembly to regulate its own operation, preventing clogs and maintaining optimal performance. This self-service capability improves productivity by reducing downtime while the automation handles the complexity of continuous monitoring and adjustment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentEP4427578A1Square baler with active drop floor
Publication Date: 2024.09.11 CNH IND BELGIUM NV
  • EP4427578A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4427578A1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4427578A1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A rotor cutter assembly (18) for an agricultural baler (10) includes: a rotatable rotor (50); a rotor floor assembly (300) disposed below the rotor (50) and comprising a frame assembly (310); and a cutter (320) coupled to the frame assembly (310) and configured to cut crop material moved by the rotor (50) during rotation of the rotor (50) while the frame assembly (310) is in a cutting position. The rotor floor assembly (300) includes a suspension assembly (330) coupled to the frame assembly (310) such that a distance between the cutter (320) and the rotor (50) is adjustable responsively to crop volume and/or density changes between the rotor (50) and the cutter (320) while the frame assembly (310) is in the cutting position, the frame assembly (310) is movable to a maintenance position where the cutter (320) is removable from the frame assembly (310), and only a portion (520) of the frame assembly (310) is movable in the cutting position.