Square Baler Movable Flow Guide for Knotter Cleaning

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing square balers face productivity issues due to frequent interruptions for cleaning the knotter, as small fragments of harvest material escape and settle, requiring high blower power and energy to maintain long cleaning intervals.

Innovation Solution

A square baler design featuring a movable flow guiding element that directs the blower air stream to alternately blow away particles from knotters, optimizing the timing and position of the air stream to delay particle deposition, allowing for longer cleaning intervals with lower blower power, and using multiple knotters and flaps to distribute the air stream effectively.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of time

If a powerful blower is used to increase air stream flow velocity, then the cleaning interval is extended, but the drive energy consumption increases and the economy deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecleaning intervalVSAvoiddrive energy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The flow guiding element is made movable and is rotated in sync with the press piston, dynamically changing the air stream direction to alternate between different knotters. This dynamic positioning allows a single blower to serve multiple knotters sequentially, extending cleaning intervals without requiring increased blower power.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs periodic action by rotating the flow guiding element in sync with the press piston's movement cycle. The air stream is periodically directed at different knotters in alternating fashion, creating a rhythmic cleaning pattern that prevents particle accumulation on any single knottter over extended periods without requiring high continuous power.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

2Device complexity

If the flow guiding element is stationary, then the device complexity is low, but the particle layer grows on the knotter and frequent cleaning is required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflow guiding element mechanismVSAvoidcleaning interval
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The flow guiding element is designed to rotate dynamically in sync with the press piston's movement. This dynamic positioning allows the air stream to be directed alternately at different knotters, preventing particle accumulation on any single knottter and extending cleaning intervals without requiring complex control systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The flow guiding element is driven directly by the press piston's movement, utilizing the existing mechanical energy in the system. This self-driven mechanism eliminates the need for separate motors or control systems, maintaining simplicity while achieving effective particle removal through the alternating air stream.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Device complexity

If a single blower serves multiple knotters, then the device complexity is reduced, but the air stream must be precisely directed to avoid particle deposition

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveblower system configurationVSAvoidair stream direction control
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The flow guiding element rotates dynamically in sync with the press piston's movement cycle, automatically adjusting the air stream direction to alternate between different knotters. This dynamic positioning simplifies the blower system configuration while ensuring precise air stream direction through mechanical synchronization rather than complex control mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The flow guiding element is driven directly by the press piston's movement, utilizing the existing mechanical energy in the system. This self-driven approach eliminates the need for separate motors or control systems, reducing device complexity while maintaining precise air stream direction through the inherent synchronization of the mechanical components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design effectively delays the growth of particle layers on knotters, reducing the need for frequent cleaning and maintaining productivity while minimizing energy consumption.

Implementation Method 1

a blower (26) and a flow guiding element (31). The flow guiding element (31) is moveable between a first position, in which it directs a blowing air stream of the blower (26) onto the first knotter (20)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAir stream:

Implementation Method 2

Particles that have settled in the knotter are thus ultimately subjected to the pulling force of the blowing air stream or stationary air. This change promotes movements of the particles which facilitate adhering particles to separate from the knotter again

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectParticle movement:

Data Source

PatentUS9814185B2Square baler
Publication Date: 2017.11.14 USINES CLAAS FRANCE SAS
  • US9814185B2 patent drawing
  • US9814185B2 patent drawing
  • US9814185B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A square baler has a press channel, a knotter arranged on the press channel, a blower and flow guide element, which is moveable between a first position, in which the flow guide element directs a blowing air stream of the blower onto the knotter, and at least one second position, in which the flow guide element directs the blowing air stream past the knotter.