SRAM Cell Design with Differential Beta Ratios for Write Margin

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In deep sub-micron integrated circuit technology, existing SRAM cell designs using FinFETs face challenges such as current crowding, degraded write and read margins, and limitations in co-optimizing cell size, cell current, and Vcc, with additional fabrication costs due to the lack of freedom in tuning the alpha ratio for optimized read stability and write margin.

Innovation Solution

The design introduces two SRAM cells with different numbers of transistors, each with distinct threshold voltages and gate stacks, and a write-assist circuitry to dynamically adjust voltages, allowing for optimized alpha ratios and improved stability and margin performance, while simplifying the manufacturing process.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Area of stationary object

If the beta ratio is set close to 1 to reduce cell size, then the cell area is minimized, but current crowding occurs and write margin is degraded

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecell areaVSAvoidwrite margin
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies different beta ratios to different transistor types within the same SRAM cell. Specifically, pull-down devices use a first beta ratio while pass-gate devices use a second beta ratio, allowing local optimization of transistor dimensions to balance cell size reduction with adequate write margin and current distribution

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the beta ratio parameters differentially across transistor types. By setting the first beta ratio for pull-down devices and a second beta ratio for pass-gate devices, the invention optimizes the balance between cell area minimization and write operation reliability, preventing current crowding while maintaining compact cell dimensions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If the alpha ratio is increased to improve write margin, then write capability is enhanced, but read stability margin is degraded

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewrite marginVSAvoidread stability margin
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent adjusts the alpha ratio parameter by differentiating the beta ratios between pull-down devices and pass-gate devices. This parameter optimization allows achieving adequate write margin while maintaining sufficient read stability margin, balancing the trade-off between write capability and read stability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies different beta ratio values to different transistor locations within the cell, which indirectly controls the alpha ratio. This local differentiation allows the circuit to achieve both good write margin and read stability without requiring extreme alpha ratio values

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Loss of energy

If FinFETs are used to reduce leakage in advanced technology nodes, then power consumption is reduced, but freedom to co-optimize cell size, cell current and Vcc is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveleakage currentVSAvoidco-optimization freedom
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent restores co-optimization freedom by introducing differential beta ratios that can be adjusted independently. This allows simultaneous optimization of cell size, cell current, and Vcc while maintaining the low leakage characteristics of FinFETs, as the beta ratio parameters provide additional degrees of freedom for circuit optimization

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Speed

If equal numbers of pull-down devices and pass-gate devices are used for high speed operation, then cell speed is improved, but cell size increases and alpha ratio tuning freedom is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecell speedVSAvoidcell size
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies different beta ratios to pull-down devices and pass-gate devices, allowing unequal transistor dimensions to achieve the same effective drive strength. This enables high-speed operation with equal functional capability while minimizing cell size, as transistors can be sized differently based on their specific functional requirements rather than requiring equal numbers

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS9870815B2Structure and method for a SRAM circuit
Publication Date: 2018.01.16 TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING CO LTD
  • US9870815B2 patent drawing
  • US9870815B2 patent drawing
  • US9870815B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure provides an integrated circuit formed in a semiconductor substrate. The integrated circuit includes a first static random access memory (SRAM) cell having a first cell size; and a second SRAM cell having a second cell size greater than the first cell size. The first SRAM cell includes first n-type field effect transistors (nFETs) each having a first gate stack. The second SRAM cell includes second nFETs each having a second gate stack different from the first gate stack.