6T SRAM Cell Transistor Layout for Read Current Efficiency

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional six-transistor (6T) SRAM cell designs face challenges in maintaining stable charge storage and efficient read current flow due to longer physical paths and higher resistance in the transistor configurations, leading to potential degradation and variability in memory performance.

Innovation Solution

The novel 6T SRAM cell structure positions the N-type pull-down transistor laterally between the N-type pass gate and P-type pull-up transistors, creating a shorter and lower resistance path for read current flow, with a unique arrangement of transistors and active regions that enhance fabrication ease and performance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional 6T SRAM cell designs are used with conventional transistor configurations, then the cell structure is simpler to fabricate, but the read current path is longer and has higher resistance, leading to degraded memory performance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvememory performanceVSAvoidtransistor configuration
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent inverts the conventional transistor arrangement by positioning the pull-down transistor between the pass gate and pull-up transistor, rather than the pull-up transistor being in the middle. This inversion creates a shorter read current path with lower resistance, improving memory performance while maintaining fabrication compatibility

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent utilizes vertical channel transistors with selective orientation, where some transistors have channels extending in different directions. This dimensional approach allows optimization of the read current path geometry without increasing planar footprint, achieving shorter paths and lower resistance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Reliability

If conventional SRAM cell layouts are used, then fabrication processes are easier, but contact resistance and path length for read current are higher, causing variability in performance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecharge storage stabilityVSAvoidfabrication process
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies different channel orientations to different transistors within the same cell - specifically, the pass gate transistor has its channel oriented perpendicular to the bit line, while other transistors have parallel orientation. This local differentiation optimizes read current flow characteristics and reduces variability without complicating the overall fabrication process

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Productivity

If longer physical paths are used in transistor configurations, then device layout is simpler, but read current efficiency decreases and performance variability increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveread current efficiencyVSAvoidtransistor arrangement
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

By inverting the conventional arrangement where the pull-up transistor sits between the pass gate and pull-down transistor, the patent creates a direct shorter path for read current. The new configuration places the pull-down transistor in the middle position, reducing the physical path length and improving read current efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the transistor channels into different orientation groups, with the pass gate transistor having perpendicular channel orientation and other transistors having parallel orientation. This segmentation allows independent optimization of the read current path geometry to minimize length and resistance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS10403629B2Six-transistor (6T) SRAM cell structure
Publication Date: 2019.09.03 GLOBALFOUNDRIES US INC
  • US10403629B2 patent drawing
  • US10403629B2 patent drawing
  • US10403629B2 patent drawing

AI summary

One illustrative 6T SRAM cell structure disclosed herein includes a first active region with a first N-type pass gate transistor, a first N-type pull-down transistor and a first P-type pull-up transistor, each of which are formed in and above the first active region, wherein the first N-type pull-down transistor is positioned laterally between the first N-type pass gate transistor and the first P-type pull-up transistor, and a second active region with a second N-type pass gate transistor, a second N-type pull-down transistor and a second P-type pull-up transistor, each of which are formed in and above the second active region, wherein the second N-type pull-down transistor is positioned laterally between the second N-type pass gate transistor and the second P-type pull-up transistor.