Sensor-Triggered SRL Harness Locking for Shorter Fall Arrest

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing self-retracting lanyard (SRL) systems require a person to fall for a certain distance before the locking components engage, leading to potential rebound and shock forces that can cause injury.

Innovation Solution

A smart safety harness system that includes sensors and processors to detect excessive movement of an object and automatically transmit a signal to control the locking component of an SRL, preventing falls and reducing rebound forces.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a self-retracting lanyard (SRL) is used to allow occupants to leave the lift to do work, then freedom of movement is improved, but fall distance increases leading to rebound and shock forces that can cause injury

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefreedom of movementVSAvoidrebound and shock forces
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary detection of fall conditions using sensors (accelerometers, gyroscopes, barometers) and algorithms that analyze movement patterns before a complete fall occurs. The controller proactively activates the locking mechanism when imminent fall is detected, preventing the full development of harmful rebound and shock forces that would occur with traditional reactive SRL systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the purely mechanical centrifugal force-based locking mechanism with an intelligent system using sensors (accelerometers, gyroscopes, barometers), processors running fall-detection algorithms, and electronic controllers. This substitution enables proactive detection and response to fall conditions, significantly reducing the fall distance and harmful forces compared to traditional mechanical SRL systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Ease of operation

If the locking components in the SRL are designed to engage only after a certain fall distance, then the system allows normal movement without false lockups, but the fall distance becomes excessive causing injury

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenormal movement without false lockupsVSAvoidfall protection effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously monitors movement parameters using accelerometers, gyroscopes, and barometers, providing real-time feedback to the controller. The fall-detection algorithms analyze this feedback data to distinguish between normal movement patterns and imminent fall conditions, enabling proactive locking before excessive fall distance occurs while avoiding false lockups during normal operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The intelligent detection system identifies and responds to imminent fall conditions before the actual fall completes, performing the locking action in advance. This preliminary intervention reduces the fall distance to minimal levels while maintaining system reliability, unlike traditional systems that only react after the fall has already occurred.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Device complexity

If a traditional mechanical SRL system is used, then the device complexity is low, but the system cannot detect and prevent falls before they occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem simplicityVSAvoidfall detection and prevention capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces simple mechanical components with an intelligent system incorporating accelerometers, gyroscopes, barometers, processors, and fall-detection algorithms. This substitution dramatically improves fall detection and prevention capability while the modular architecture keeps the added complexity manageable and integrated within the SRL housing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system integrates multiple sensor functions (acceleration detection, orientation sensing, altitude measurement) and processing capabilities into a single multi-functional fall-detection unit. This universal approach provides comprehensive fall prevention while consolidating components to minimize the increase in overall device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system effectively detects imminent falls and automatically locks the SRL, minimizing fall distance and reducing the risk of injury from rebound forces, while allowing users maximum freedom of movement without unnecessary lockups.

Implementation Method 1

one or more sensors operably coupled with the one or more straps and detect movement of the object

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMovement detection: Accelerometer

Implementation Method 2

The centrifugal forces acting on the locking pawls in the SRL cause the locking pawls to overcome spring tension and rotate outwards to the locked position. When the locking pawls engage the ratchet latches, the rotation of the SRL is stopped and no additional lanyard can be extended.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical locking: Ratchet

Data Source

PatentUS20250170434A1Safety harness systems and methods
Publication Date: 2025.05.29 THE BOEING CO
  • US20250170434A1 patent drawing
  • US20250170434A1 patent drawing
  • US20250170434A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and a method include a safety harness system having straps operably coupled with an object, and sensors operably coupled with the straps. The sensors detect movement of the object and transmit data associated with the movement of the object to one or more processors. The processors determine that an amount of movement of the object exceeds a movement threshold, and transmit a signal responsive to the one or more processors determining that the amount of movement of the object exceeds the movement threshold.