Switched Reluctance Motor Current Control for High Speed and Low Ripple

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing control methods for switched reluctance motors (SRMs) struggle with achieving high-speed operation and low torque ripple due to their simplicity and inability to accurately control drive currents.

Innovation Solution

A digital closed-loop control method for SRMs that involves converting measured drive currents into reference current values in a rotating reference frame, generating updated reference voltage values based on target data and inductance values, and controlling the inverter to set the voltages of the phase outputs accordingly.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If simple control methods are used for SRMs, then device complexity is reduced, but motor performance (high speed operation and low torque ripple) cannot be achieved

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol method complexityVSAvoidmotor operating speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a digital closed-loop control system that continuously measures drive currents, transforms them to a rotating reference frame, compares them with target currents, and adjusts voltage outputs accordingly. This feedback mechanism enables high-speed operation and low torque ripple by dynamically correcting current deviations from desired values.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transforms control parameters from a stationary reference frame to a rotating reference frame synchronized with the motor's electrical angular speed. This parameter transformation simplifies the control of high-speed operation by converting time-varying parameters into steady-state equivalents in the rotating frame, enabling effective high-speed control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Device complexity

If simple control methods are used for SRMs, then device complexity is reduced, but torque ripple is increased

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol method complexityVSAvoidtorque ripple
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The closed-loop control system continuously monitors drive currents and adjusts voltage outputs to maintain currents at target values. This feedback control suppresses current fluctuations that cause torque ripple, enabling smooth motor operation even with the inherent non-linearities of SRMs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs dynamic voltage adjustment based on real-time current measurements and target current discrepancies. The control system adapts voltage outputs moment-by-moment to compensate for inductance variations and maintain constant torque production, thereby reducing torque ripple through dynamic rather than static control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Speed

If digital closed-loop control with reference frame transformation is implemented, then motor performance (high speed and low torque ripple) is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemotor operating speedVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a rotating reference frame as an intermediary coordinate system between the stationary measurement frame and the control output frame. This intermediary transformation simplifies the control of high-speed operation by converting complex time-varying parameters into steady-state parameters in the rotating frame, making high-speed control more manageable despite increased computational requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Productivity

If digital closed-loop control with reference frame transformation is implemented, then motor performance (high speed and low torque ripple) is improved, but control calculation complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemotor efficiencyVSAvoidcontrol calculation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the reference frame parameters from stationary to rotating coordinates synchronized with the motor's electrical angular speed. This parameter transformation converts complex time-varying control problems into steady-state control problems in the rotating frame, improving motor efficiency through better current control despite increased computational complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS12237786B1Motor control method and device
Publication Date: 2025.02.25 MONUMO LTD
  • US12237786B1 patent drawing
  • US12237786B1 patent drawing
  • US12237786B1 patent drawing

AI summary

In one embodiment, the method includes i) obtaining target data specifying desired operating parameters of a switched reluctance motor, ii) obtaining data indicative of a value of a measured drive current for each of the phase outputs of an associated inverter, iii) converting the measured drive current values from a stationary reference frame into reference current values in a rotating reference frame, iv) generating, based on the reference current values and the target data and the set of inductance values, updated reference voltage values in the rotating reference frame, v) converting the updated reference voltage values from the rotating reference frame into updated voltage values in the stationary reference frame, and vi) controlling the inverter to set the voltages of the phase outputs to the updated voltage values.