SRM/MRM Assay for BRAF Protein Quantification in FFPE Tissue

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for analyzing BRAF protein levels in formalin-fixed cancer tissue samples are inefficient due to the unsuitability of many peptide sequences for mass spectrometry-based SRM/MRM assays, leading to difficulties in detecting and quantifying the protein accurately.

Innovation Solution

The use of specific BRAF fragment peptides, such as SEQ ID NO:4, in a mass spectrometry-based SRM/MRM assay, which involves proteolytic digestion of formalin-fixed tissue using Liquid Tissue protocol and analysis on a triple quadrupole mass spectrometer, allows for relative and absolute quantitation of BRAF protein levels by comparing signature peak areas, with the option of using an isotope-labeled internal standard for absolute quantitation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If mass spectrometry-based SRM/MRM assays are used to analyze BRAF protein levels in formalin-fixed cancer tissue samples, then quantitative data can be obtained, but many peptide sequences are unsuitable for detection leading to inaccurate quantification

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection accuracyVSAvoidpeptide suitability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by selecting specific peptide sequences with optimized properties for mass spectrometry detection. The invention identifies and uses particular BRAF-derived peptides (such as those with specific amino acid compositions and fragmentation patterns) that exhibit superior ionization efficiency and detectability in SRM/MRM assays, thereby resolving the detection difficulty while maintaining measurement precision

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Quantity of substance

If formalin-fixed tissue is used for BRAF analysis, then tissue preservation and availability are improved, but protein extraction and peptide detection become more difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetissue availabilityVSAvoidprotein extraction
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-optimizing the selection of BRAF peptide sequences before formalin fixation is performed. The identified peptides are chosen specifically because they remain detectable and quantifiable after formalin fixation and paraffin embedding processes. This preliminary selection ensures that when tissue is fixed and stored, the target peptides remain suitable for later SRM/MRM analysis, thereby easing the subsequent protein extraction and detection steps

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Productivity

If relative quantitation is performed by comparing signature peak areas, then quantification can be achieved, but absolute quantitation requires additional internal standards increasing assay complexity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequantification speedVSAvoidassay complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by implementing a tiered quantification approach. The assay is designed to provide relative quantitation through direct comparison of signature peak areas, which can be achieved quickly and efficiently. The option for absolute quantitation using isotope-labeled internal standards is available but not required for all applications. This partial implementation allows users to obtain sufficient quantitative data for their needs without always incurring the additional complexity and cost of internal standards

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method provides accurate and precise quantitative data for BRAF protein levels, enabling diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic insights, aiding in cancer staging and treatment decisions by correlating protein expression with therapeutic agents, thus facilitating personalized medicine approaches.

Implementation Method 1

analysis on a triple quadrupole mass spectrometer

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMass spectrometry:

Implementation Method 2

proteolytic digestion of formalin-fixed tissue using Liquid Tissue protocol

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectProteolytic digestion: Enzyme

Implementation Method 3

using an isotope-labeled internal standard for absolute quantitation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectIsotope labeling:

Data Source

PatentEP3167289B1SRM/MRM assay for the serine/threonine-protein kinase b-raf (BRAF)
Publication Date: 2020.03.11 ONCOPLEX DIAGNOSTICS INC
  • EP3167289B1 patent drawingFigure 1A~1C
  • EP3167289B1 patent drawing
  • EP3167289B1 patent drawing

AI summary

The current disclosure provides for specific peptides, and derived ionization characteristics of the peptides, from the Serine/Threoninc-Protein Kinase B-raf (BRAF) that are particularly advantageous for quantifying the BRAF protein directly in biological samples that have been fixed in formalin by the method of Selected Reaction Monitoring (SRM) mass spectrometry, or what can also be termed as Multiple Reaction Monitoring (MRM) mass spectrometry. Such biological samples are chemically preserved and fixed where the biological sample is selected from tissues and cells treated with formaldehyde containing agents/fixatives including formalin-fixed tissue/cells, formalin-fixed/paraffin embedded (FFPE) tissue/cells, FFPE tissue blocks and cells from those blocks, and tissue culture cells that have been formalin fixed and or paraffin embedded.