Super Regenerative Receiver Synchronization via Quench Rate Adjustment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Super regenerative receivers (SRRs) in wireless sensor networks face challenges with interference rejection due to their operation at radio frequency and lack of filtering capabilities, which are exacerbated by undersampling methods that disrupt synchronization.

Innovation Solution

A method for pulse synchronization in SRRs is implemented by setting the quench rate to 1.5 times the chip rate, acquiring an expected preamble sequence, computing correlation metrics, and identifying the best sample set for demodulation based on decision metrics, thereby achieving frame and pulse synchronization.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If undersampling is used to improve interference rejection capability, then interference rejection is improved, but synchronization is disturbed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinterference rejection capabilityVSAvoidsynchronization
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts the quench rate to exactly 1.5 times the chip rate, creating a flexible sampling mechanism that adapts to the signal structure. This dynamic parameter setting enables the receiver to optimally balance interference rejection with synchronization maintenance, resolving the contradiction between improved_feature and worsening_feature

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

By changing the quench rate parameter to a specific value (1.5× chip rate), the system transforms the sampling process to generate three samples per chip period. This parameter change enables both improved interference rejection through undersampling and maintains synchronization by aligning with the signal structure, simultaneously addressing both requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Object-affected harmful factors

If filtering techniques are applied at the output of SRR to improve interference rejection, then interference rejection is improved, but power consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinterference rejection capabilityVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical/filtering approach with a signal processing approach. Instead of using physical filters that consume power, the system uses correlation-based detection and quench rate optimization to achieve interference rejection, substituting one mechanism for another that is more energy-efficient while operating at RF

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The quench signal acts as an intermediary mechanism that enables interference rejection without requiring additional filtering components. By modulating the resonator with a specific quench rate, the system achieves frequency selectivity and interference rejection through the quenching process itself, avoiding the need for separate filtering stages that would increase power consumption

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Object-affected harmful factors

If fractional quench rate of 1.5 times chip rate is used to improve interference rejection, then interference rejection is improved, but identification of desired sample set becomes complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinterference rejection capabilityVSAvoidsynchronization complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses correlation metrics as feedback to identify the desired sample set. By computing correlation between the received signal and expected preamble/SFD sequences, the system receives feedback that indicates which sample sets correctly represent the chips. This feedback mechanism simplifies the identification process despite the fractional sampling rate, resolving the contradiction between improved_feature and worsening_feature

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach improves interference rejection capabilities and maintains synchronization, enhancing the performance of SRRs in wireless sensor networks by effectively handling adjacent channel interference and additive white Gaussian noise.

Implementation Method 1

A super regenerative receiver (SRR) is a low-power receiver that may be used in wireless sensor networks... the SRR operates at a radio frequency (RF)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectResonance: Resonance

Implementation Method 2

computing respective correlation metrics for bits of the expected SFD sequence while the expected SFD sequence is acquired for all of the possible sample sets

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCorrelation:

Data Source

PatentUS9692588B2System and method for performing synchronization and interference rejection in super regenerative receiver (SRR)
Publication Date: 2017.06.27 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD
  • US9692588B2 patent drawing
  • US9692588B2 patent drawing
  • US9692588B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of performing synchronization in a super regenerative receiver (SRR) includes setting a quench rate of the SRR to a value of 1.5 times a chip rate of an incoming signal, acquiring an expected preamble sequence of an arbitrary sample set among a plurality of possible sample sets, acquiring an expected start frame delimiter (SFD) sequence for all of the possible sample sets to achieve frame synchronization, computing respective correlation metrics for bits of the expected SFD sequence while the expected SFD sequence is acquired for all of the possible sample sets, calculating a decision metric based on the correlation metrics in response to an SFD sequence being detected for one or more of the possible sample sets, and identifying a best sample set for demodulating the incoming signal among all of the possible sample sets based on the decision metric to achieve pulse synchronization.