Sounding Reference Signal Power Control for LTE-A Coverage

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In wireless communication systems, the conventional maximum power reduction (MPR) scheme for sounding reference signals (SRS) reduces cell coverage when used in coordinated multi-point (COMP) operations, especially in LTE-A systems with carrier aggregation (CA), leading to decreased coverage and stability in data transmission.

Innovation Solution

Independently setting a higher power backoff for SRS transmission between cells or coordinated cells, allowing for optimized SRS power adjustment and using adaptive modulation coding (AMC) to enhance data throughput, while maintaining cell coverage through PUCCH over-provisioning.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If conventional maximum power reduction (MPR) scheme is applied for sounding reference signals, then transmission power is reduced to meet spectral emission limits, but cell coverage is reduced and data transmission stability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespectral emission limit complianceVSAvoidcell coverage
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the power backoff application by introducing separate MPR parameters for different signal types (MPR_SRS for sounding reference signals and MPR_PUSCH for uplink shared channel). This allows independent optimization of power reduction for SRS transmissions, enabling higher SRS power relative to data transmissions, thereby maintaining cell coverage while still meeting spectral emission limits through controlled power reduction on other signals.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the power control parameters by introducing new MPR parameters (MPR_SRS, MPR_PUSCH) with different values and adjustment mechanisms. The base station can independently adjust MPR_SRS to be lower than MPR_PUSCH, allowing SRS to transmit at higher power to maintain coverage, while PUSCH uses higher power reduction to meet emission limits. This parameter differentiation resolves the contradiction between emission compliance and coverage maintenance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Object-affected harmful factors

If maximum power reduction is applied uniformly to all uplink signals, then spectral emission limits are met, but data transmission rate and reliability deteriorate due to reduced SRS quality

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespectral emission limit complianceVSAvoiddata transmission reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments power control into separate domains for control/signaling signals (SRS) and data signals (PUSCH) by introducing distinct MPR parameters. This segmentation allows SRS to maintain higher power for reliable channel state information feedback, while PUSCH applies greater power reduction to meet emission limits, thus maintaining data transmission reliability without violating spectral constraints.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces adjustable MPR parameters that can be independently configured by the base station. By setting MPR_SRS < MPR_PUSCH, the system prioritizes SRS transmission quality for reliable channel estimation and feedback, while ensuring emission compliance through higher power reduction on data transmissions. The parameters can be dynamically adjusted based on channel conditions and network requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Area of stationary object

If higher SRS transmission power is used to maintain cell coverage, then spectral emission limits may be exceeded, but if lower power is used, coverage is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecell coverageVSAvoidspectral emission limit compliance
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces flexible MPR parameters (MPR_SRS, MPR_PUSCH) that can be independently adjusted by the base station according to network conditions, UE capabilities, and regulatory requirements. This allows the system to optimize the balance between coverage and emission compliance dynamically, rather than using a fixed uniform power reduction that would force a compromise between these conflicting objectives.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements dynamic power control where the base station can adjust MPR parameters in real-time based on channel conditions, interference levels, and network load. This dynamic adjustment allows the system to maintain coverage when needed by reducing MPR_SRS, while ensuring emission compliance by increasing MPR_PUSCH when spectral limits are approached, resolving the static contradiction through adaptive control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS9661591B2Method for reducing transmission power for sounding reference signal and terminal therefor
Publication Date: 2017.05.23 LG ELECTRONICS INC
  • US9661591B2 patent drawing
  • US9661591B2 patent drawing
  • US9661591B2 patent drawing

AI summary

One embodiment of the present invention provides a method for transmitting a signal in a terminal. The method for transmitting a signal in a terminal comprises the steps of: setting a maximum power reduction (MPR) value for signal transmission power, wherein the maximum power reduction value is independently set for a sounding reference signal (SRS), and the maximum power reduction value which is set for the SRS is different from a maximum power reduction value which is set for another signal; and transmitting the SRS with transmission power which is set according to the set maximum power reduction value.