SRv6 TE Policy Selection for SLA-Aware Packet Forwarding

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing SRv6 TE Policies fail to meet Service Level Agreement (SLA) requirements due to deteriorating path quality, affecting service quality in network forwarding.

Innovation Solution

A method for packet forwarding that selects a Segment Routing IPv6 (SRv6) Traffic Engineering (TE) Policy with the highest link priority that meets target quality conditions, using Intelligent Policy Routing (IPR) templates to ensure optimal path selection and avoid degraded paths.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the SRv6 TE Policy with the highest link priority is selected without quality assessment, then forwarding efficiency is improved, but service quality deteriorates due to degraded path quality

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveforwarding efficiencyVSAvoidservice quality
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-establishing multiple IPR templates with different quality conditions and link priorities before actual packet forwarding. When a packet arrives, the system has already prepared multiple candidate paths with assessed quality metrics, enabling rapid selection of the appropriate path without real-time quality degradation. This pre-assessment mechanism ensures both forwarding efficiency and service quality are maintained.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If multiple IPR templates with different quality conditions are maintained, then service quality is improved through selective path choice, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice qualityVSAvoidtemplate management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent utilizes parameter changes by varying the quality condition parameters (such as bandwidth thresholds, latency requirements, and link priority levels) across different IPR templates. This allows the system to manage complexity through standardized parameter variations rather than fundamentally different template structures. The headend device can systematically generate and manage templates by adjusting these parameters based on service requirements, making the complexity manageable and scalable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If real-time quality assessment is performed for path selection, then service quality is improved, but processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice qualityVSAvoidpath selection time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent resolves this contradiction by performing quality assessment in advance and storing the results in pre-configured IPR templates. The templates contain pre-evaluated quality conditions and associated link priorities, so when a packet needs forwarding, the headend device simply matches the packet's service requirements against these pre-assessed templates rather than performing real-time quality measurements. This eliminates processing delays while maintaining service quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Speed

If the highest link priority path is always selected, then forwarding speed is improved, but SLA compliance deteriorates when path quality degrades

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveforwarding speedVSAvoidSLA compliance
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by making the path selection adaptive rather than static. The system dynamically selects paths based on matching the packet's required quality conditions with the pre-assessed IPR templates. When path quality degrades, the system can dynamically switch to alternative paths with different quality conditions that still meet SLA requirements. This dynamic adaptation ensures both forwarding speed and SLA compliance are maintained under varying network conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS20250310265A1Method and apparatus for packet forwarding, and electronic device
Publication Date: 2025.10.02 NEW H3C TECH CO LTD
  • US20250310265A1 patent drawing
  • US20250310265A1 patent drawing
  • US20250310265A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed are a method and apparatus for packet forwarding and an electronic device, which relate to the field of communication technology. The method includes: receiving a service packet having a destination address and a flow characteristic; obtaining a target service attribute matching the flow characteristic, and obtaining at least one intelligent policy routing (IPR) template matching the destination address; selecting a target IPR template matching the target service attribute from the at least one IPR template, and obtaining a target quality condition of the target IPR template; selecting a SRv6 TE policy meeting the target quality condition from the target IPR template, wherein the SRv6 TE policy includes a first candidate path; forwarding the service packet through the first candidate path; wherein each IPR template comprises multiple SRv6 TE policies with a same service attribute and a quality condition corresponding to the service attribute, the multiple SRv6 TE policies have different link priorities, and the selected SRv6 TE policy has a highest link priority.