SSCB Current Pulsing for Selective Breaker Coordination

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The challenge of selectively coordinating solid-state circuit breakers with mechanical circuit breakers in electrical distribution systems is difficult due to their disparate time-current characteristics, leading to inefficient fault isolation and potential damage from arcing and slow reaction times.

Innovation Solution

A method and system for a solid-state circuit breaker (SSCB) that pulses short circuit current to regulate its RMS value within specific limits, using hysteresis control to coordinate with downstream mechanical breakers, ensuring only mechanical breakers isolate faults while preventing premature SSCB tripping.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If conventional mechanical circuit breakers are used, then the system has simple construction and ease of manufacture, but the reaction time is slow (several milliseconds) and arcing causes contact damage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereaction timeVSAvoidconstruction complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical switching mechanism with a solid-state electronic switch, eliminating moving parts and mechanical contacts. This substitution achieves microsecond-level response times while removing the arcing problem inherent in mechanical contactors, directly resolving the contradiction between speed and construction complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the operational parameters of the circuit breaker by using solid-state devices that operate in the electronic domain rather than mechanical domain. This parameter change enables significantly faster switching speeds and eliminates contact wear from arcing, resolving the speed-complexity contradiction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If solid-state circuit breakers are used, then the reaction time is fast (microseconds) and there is no arcing, but the device complexity increases due to solid-state switching components

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefault isolation reliabilityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces mechanical contacts with solid-state switching devices, achieving superior reliability through elimination of contact wear and arcing. The solid-state implementation provides consistent performance without the variability inherent in mechanical systems, directly improving reliability while accepting increased device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Speed

If solid-state circuit breakers are used in distribution systems with mechanical breakers, then rapid fault detection is achieved, but selective coordination becomes difficult due to disparate time-current characteristics

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefault detection speedVSAvoidselective coordination difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic control of the solid-state circuit breaker's tripping characteristics, allowing the time-current curve to be adjusted and optimized for coordination with downstream mechanical breakers. This dynamic adjustability enables selective coordination while maintaining the fast response capability of solid-state devices.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the operational parameters of the solid-state circuit breaker to match coordination requirements, adjusting tripping thresholds and time delays to create compatible time-current characteristics with downstream mechanical breakers, thereby resolving the coordination difficulty.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Ease of manufacture

If mechanical circuit breakers are used, then the construction is simple and cost-effective, but the contacts experience arcing that can weld them together and cause explosions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing simplicityVSAvoidarcing damage
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces mechanical contacts with solid-state switching devices, completely eliminating the arcing phenomenon that causes contact welding and potential explosions. This substitution maintains manufacturing simplicity while removing the harmful arcing effects.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent eliminates the harmful effect of arcing by transitioning to solid-state operation, where the switching occurs without contact separation. This conversion of the switching mechanism removes the source of ionized gases and molten metal that cause contact damage and safety hazards.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables efficient and selective coordination of solid-state and mechanical breakers, minimizing arc-related damage and ensuring rapid fault isolation without unnecessary SSCB tripping, enhancing system reliability and safety.

Implementation Method 1

using hysteresis control to coordinate with downstream mechanical breakers, ensuring only mechanical breakers isolate faults while preventing premature SSCB tripping

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHysteresis control: Hysteresis

Data Source

PatentEP4167415B1Selective coordination of solid-state circuit breakers and mechanical circuit breakers in electrical distribution systems
Publication Date: 2025.10.22 ATOM POWER INC
  • EP4167415B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4167415B1 patent drawingFigure 2~3
  • EP4167415B1 patent drawingFigure 4

AI summary

In an electrical distribution system including a solid-state circuit breaker (SSCB) and one or more downstream mechanical circuit breakers (CBs), a solid-state switching device in the SSCB is repeatedly switched ON and OFF during a short circuit event, to reduce a root-mean-square (RMS) value of the short circuit current. The resulting pulsed short circuit current is regulated in a hysteresis control loop, to limit the RMS to a value low enough to prevent the SSCB from tripping prematurely but high enough to allow one of the downstream mechanical CBs to trip and isolate the short circuit. Pulsing is allowed to continue for a maximum short circuit pulsing time. Only if none of the downstream mechanical CBs is able to trip to isolate the short circuit within the maximum short circuit pulsing time is the SSCB allowed to trip.