SSD Controller Adaptive Channel Allocation for Latency Throughput Trade-off

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Solid state memory controllers often operate disadvantageously when switching between high-throughput and low-latency operations, as they are typically tailored for one approach at the expense of the other, leading to suboptimal performance in varying usage scenarios.

Innovation Solution

A user-configurable solid state memory controller that adjusts request servicing by distributing information across multiple channels for low-latency operations and fewer channels for high-throughput operations, utilizing control circuitry and firmware to dynamically manage channel resources based on request types.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of time

If the controller is tailored for low-latency operations by distributing information across multiple channels, then latency is reduced, but throughput decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovelatencyVSAvoidthroughput
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The controller dynamically adjusts the number of channels used for each I/O request based on the operation type. For low-latency operations (random reads/writes), it distributes data across multiple channels simultaneously. For high-throughput operations (sequential reads/writes), it concentrates data transfer on fewer channels. This dynamic adaptation allows the system to optimize performance characteristics in real-time based on workload requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The controller changes the parameter of channel utilization from fixed to variable. It monitors operation characteristics and adjusts the degree of parallelism (number of active channels) accordingly. This parameter change enables the system to achieve both low-latency and high-throughput performance by selecting appropriate channel configurations for different operation types.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If the controller is tailored for high-throughput operations by using fewer channels, then throughput increases, but latency increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovethroughputVSAvoidlatency
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The controller dynamically adjusts the number of channels used for each I/O request based on the operation type. For low-latency operations (random reads/writes), it distributes data across multiple channels simultaneously. For high-throughput operations (sequential reads/writes), it concentrates data transfer on fewer channels. This dynamic adaptation allows the system to optimize performance characteristics in real-time based on workload requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The controller changes the parameter of channel utilization from fixed to variable. It monitors operation characteristics and adjusts the degree of parallelism (number of active channels) accordingly. This parameter change enables the system to achieve both low-latency and high-throughput performance by selecting appropriate channel configurations for different operation types.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If the controller uses a fixed channel configuration optimized for one operation type, then performance for that operation type is maximized, but performance for other operation types deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperation performanceVSAvoidoperation type flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The controller is designed to handle multiple operation types (random reads, sequential reads, random writes, sequential writes) with a single adaptive channel allocation mechanism. Rather than having separate dedicated controllers for different operation types, this universal controller can dynamically reconfigure its channel usage to optimize for any operation type, making the system versatile while maintaining high performance across all operation types.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The controller dynamically adjusts the number of channels used for each I/O request based on the operation type. For low-latency operations (random reads/writes), it distributes data across multiple channels simultaneously. For high-throughput operations (sequential reads/writes), it concentrates data transfer on fewer channels. This dynamic adaptation allows the system to optimize performance characteristics in real-time based on workload requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS10990308B2Solid state drive controller
Publication Date: 2021.04.27 MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC
  • US10990308B2 patent drawing
  • US10990308B2 patent drawing
  • US10990308B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A memory device may comprise circuitry to adjust between latency and throughput in transferring information through a memory port, wherein the circuitry may be capable of configuring individual partitions or individual sectors as high-throughput storage or low-latency storage.