SSD Read Error Mitigation via Region Retirement

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Solid state drives (SSDs) are prone to read failures during data retrieval, which can lead to data loss and inefficient data reconstruction, even with error correction codes or RAID recovery, negatively impacting storage system performance.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a proactive detection system that monitors memory regions for read errors, modifies error correction capabilities, and tracks a region read fail metric to determine if a memory region should be retired, thereby preventing data loss and improving drive performance by migrating data from failing regions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If error correction codes or RAID recovery are used to handle read failures, then data recovery is possible, but data loss risk remains and data reconstruction is costly and inefficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata recovery capabilityVSAvoiddata loss risk
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements proactive monitoring of read errors in memory regions before complete failure occurs. By detecting and tracking read errors in advance, the system can identify deteriorating memory regions and migrate data before catastrophic failure, thereby preventing data loss rather than merely recovering it after failure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors read errors in memory regions and uses this feedback to dynamically adjust error correction capabilities and trigger data migration when thresholds are exceeded. This closed-loop feedback mechanism enables the system to respond to deteriorating memory conditions in real-time, improving reliability while preventing data loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If data reconstruction is performed after read failure, then data can be recovered, but SSD efficiency and performance are significantly impaired

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata recoveryVSAvoidSSD efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs data migration proactively before complete memory region failure occurs. By detecting read errors early and migrating data in advance, the system avoids the need for costly and time-consuming data reconstruction operations, thereby maintaining SSD efficiency and performance while still ensuring data recovery capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent converts the harmful effect of read errors into a beneficial early warning signal. By monitoring read errors and using them as indicators of deteriorating memory regions, the system can trigger preventive data migration, transforming what would be a failure condition into an opportunity for proactive data protection without impacting performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

3Reliability

If error correction capability is increased to handle more errors, then more read errors can be corrected, but system complexity and processing overhead increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveerror correction capabilityVSAvoiderror correction system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent dynamically adjusts error correction capabilities based on the monitored read error rates in memory regions. Rather than using a fixed high-level error correction capability that would increase complexity, the system scales error correction resources according to actual needs, maintaining reliability while minimizing unnecessary complexity and processing overhead.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes operational parameters including error correction capability levels based on the severity and rate of read errors detected. By adjusting these parameters dynamically rather than maintaining maximum capability continuously, the system achieves effective error correction while avoiding the constant complexity and overhead associated with always-maximum error correction configurations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Reliability

If continuous monitoring of all memory regions is performed, then read failures can be detected early, but system overhead and performance impact increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveearly failure detectionVSAvoidmonitoring overhead
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a monitoring system that serves multiple functions: it detects read errors, tracks error rates, determines when data migration is needed, and triggers corrective actions. By making the monitoring system multi-functional, the patent reduces the need for separate dedicated monitoring infrastructure, thereby lowering overall system overhead and energy consumption while maintaining early failure detection capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The monitoring system is integrated into the normal SSD operation and utilizes existing read operations and error correction mechanisms to gather monitoring data. Rather than requiring separate dedicated monitoring resources that would increase energy consumption, the system leverages its own operational infrastructure to perform monitoring, thereby minimizing additional overhead while achieving early failure detection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS11340979B2Mitigation of solid state memory read failures with a testing procedure
Publication Date: 2022.05.24 SEAGATE TECH LLC
  • US11340979B2 patent drawing
  • US11340979B2 patent drawing
  • US11340979B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Read error mitigation in solid-state memory devices. A solid-state drive (SSD) includes a read error mitigation module that monitors one or more memory regions. In response to detecting uncorrectable read errors, memory regions of the memory device may be identified and preemptively retired. Example approaches include identifying a memory region as being suspect such that upon repeated read failures within the memory region, the memory region is retired. Moreover, memory regions may be compared to peer memory regions to determine when to retire a memory region. The read error mitigation module may trigger a test procedure on a memory region to detect the susceptibility of a memory region to read error failures. By detecting read error failures and retirement of a memory regions, data loss and/or data recovery processes may be limited to improve drive performance and reliability.