SSD Parameter Tuning Using Reinforcement Learning Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Solid-state drive (SSD) tuning is a resource-intensive and manual process that requires significant time and expertise, leading to suboptimal performance due to limited solution space exploration and reliance on local maximums.

Innovation Solution

Utilizing a reinforcement learning agent, specifically a deep-Q neural network, to automate SSD tuning by adjusting parameter settings based on performance data and reward functions, iteratively optimizing parameters through backpropagation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If manual SSD tuning process is used, then engineers can adjust parameter settings, but the process is resource intensive and time consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanual tuning operationVSAvoidtuning time
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements self-service through an automated tuning agent that performs SSD parameter optimization without human intervention. The agent autonomously executes workloads, collects performance data, and adjusts parameters based on learned policies, eliminating the need for manual engineer involvement while significantly reducing tuning time from weeks to hours or minutes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical manual tuning process with an intelligent software agent powered by machine learning. The agent uses reinforcement learning to substitute human engineers' decision-making with automated algorithms that can explore the parameter space more efficiently and identify optimal configurations faster than manual methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Adaptability or versatility

If manual tuning is performed by engineers, then domain knowledge can be applied, but solution space exploration is limited by schedule and expertise

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedomain knowledge applicationVSAvoidsolution space exploration
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements parameter changes by systematically varying SSD controller parameters across a comprehensive solution space. The tuning agent explores multiple parameter combinations including garbage collection thresholds, wear leveling settings, and cache management parameters, using reinforcement learning to identify optimal configurations that manual engineers might overlook due to time constraints or knowledge limitations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent incorporates feedback mechanisms where the tuning agent continuously monitors SSD performance metrics such as IOPS, latency, and power consumption. This feedback loop enables the agent to learn from performance outcomes and adjust parameters iteratively, allowing exhaustive solution space exploration that adapts based on actual system behavior rather than relying solely on pre-existing domain knowledge.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Productivity

If automated tuning is implemented, then time and resources are reduced, but complexity of the tuning system increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetuning efficiencyVSAvoidtuning system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary tuning agent that bridges the gap between raw SSD hardware and optimization goals. This agent layer handles the complexity of parameter interactions and performance metric analysis, presenting a simplified interface that automatically translates high-level performance objectives into specific parameter adjustments without requiring users to understand the underlying system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS12561238B2Systems, methods, and media for tuning solid-state drives
Publication Date: 2026.02.24 SK HYNIX NAND PRODUCT SOLUTIONS CORP
  • US12561238B2 patent drawing
  • US12561238B2 patent drawing
  • US12561238B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Mechanisms, including systems, methods, and media, for tuning a solid-state drive (SSD) are provided, the mechanisms including: providing as an input to a first neural network (NN) current parameter settings (PSs) of the SSD; receiving as an output from the first NN at least one adjustment to the current PSs; based on the at least one adjustment, adjusting the current PSs of the SSD so that the SSD is using adjusted PSs; causing the SSD to execute a workload using the adjusted PSs; determining performance data of the SSD while executing the workload; determining a reward value based on the performance data; and back propagating the first NN based on the reward value.