Smart Secure Platform Bundle State Management

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing mobile communication systems face challenges in effectively managing secondary platform bundles (SPBs) within smart secure platforms (SSPs), particularly in ensuring secure and user-centric management of SPB states.

Innovation Solution

A method and apparatus for managing SPBs, where a user equipment (UE) receives end user selections for managing SPB states, checks required bundle management information, determines if end user intent confirmation is needed, and accordingly manages the SPB states, including enabling, disabling, or deleting SPBs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If automated bundle management is implemented without user confirmation, then productivity and ease of operation are improved, but security and user control are worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebundle management efficiencyVSAvoidsecurity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts the level of automation based on the operation type. For high-risk operations like deletion, user confirmation is required (manual mode), while for low-risk operations like enabling/disabling, automated processing is allowed (automatic mode). This dynamic switching resolves the contradiction by optimizing both efficiency and security contextually.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameter of user interaction level based on the bundle management operation. By introducing an automatic mode parameter that bypasses user confirmation for certain operations, the system improves productivity while maintaining security through selective automation rather than universal automation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If user confirmation is required for all bundle management operations, then security is improved, but ease of operation and productivity are worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesecurityVSAvoiduser interaction complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments bundle management operations into different risk categories. High-risk operations (deletion) require user confirmation, while low-risk operations (enabling, disabling) can be automated. This segmentation resolves the contradiction by applying user confirmation only where necessary, reducing overall interaction complexity while maintaining security.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary mechanism (automatic mode with operator intervention option) that mediates between user convenience and security. This intermediary allows bulk operations to proceed automatically while providing a safety valve for operator intervention when needed, resolving the contradiction between ease of operation and security.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Productivity

If bulk bundle management operations are allowed, then productivity is improved, but risk of erroneous actions and security issues are worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebundle management throughputVSAvoiderroneous action risk
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically controls the execution of bulk operations based on their risk profile. For high-risk bulk operations like deletion, the system requires operator intervention (dynamic switching to manual mode). For low-risk bulk operations, automated processing is permitted. This dynamic control resolves the contradiction by enabling high productivity for safe operations while preventing harmful actions through selective human oversight.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies preliminary anti-action by requiring operator confirmation before executing high-risk bulk operations. This preliminary check prevents erroneous actions before they can cause harm, while allowing automated bulk processing for low-risk operations to maintain productivity. The principle resolves the contradiction by pre-emptively blocking only the harmful operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Data Source

PatentUS20250133401A1Method and apparatus for managing bundles of smart secure platform
Publication Date: 2025.04.24 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD
  • US20250133401A1 patent drawing
  • US20250133401A1 patent drawing
  • US20250133401A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method, performed by a user equipment (UE), of managing secondary platform bundles (SPBs), includes receiving an end user selection for managing a state of at least one SPB among SPBs installed in a smart secure platform (SSP) module; checking bundle management information required to manage the state of the at least one SPB based on the end user selection; determining whether end user intent confirmation is required to manage the state of the at least one SPB according to the end user selection based on the bundle management information; and managing the state of the at least one SPB based on a result of the determining.