Parallel SSPC Switch Testing for Fail-Open Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional solid state power controller (SSPC) designs fail to detect open failures in parallel switches, leading to latent-for-life-failures, increased impedance, overheating, and potential safety issues due to unbalanced current distribution.

Innovation Solution

A system and method for fail open testing in SSPCs, where a gate driver and fail open test circuit individually control each switching device to test for open failures using a power on built-in test (PBIT) by setting a bias to pass a test current and evaluating output voltage feedback, with a voltage sensor providing indicative feedback for determining pass or fail conditions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional monitoring methods are used to detect failed CLOSED conditions, then the detection of closed failures is achieved, but failed OPEN conditions cannot be detected

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection capabilityVSAvoidfailure condition information
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the monitoring function by creating separate test circuits for each parallel switching device. Each switching device is individually monitored by its own test circuit that can detect both failed CLOSED and failed OPEN conditions independently, rather than using a single collective monitoring method.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary test signal path that allows individual testing of each switching device. The test circuit uses intermediate test nodes and signals to isolate and evaluate each switching device's state without being affected by the states of other parallel devices.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If multiple parallel solid state switches are used to achieve high current capabilities, then current sharing is improved, but detection of open failures becomes impossible

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecurrent capabilityVSAvoidfailure detection
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the monitoring function into separate segments, with each parallel switching device having its own dedicated test circuit. This segmentation allows individual detection of open failures in each device while maintaining the parallel configuration for high current capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements preliminary testing of each switching device before normal operation begins. The test circuits are activated during a test mode to evaluate the state of each switching device, allowing open failures to be detected before they affect system operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Ease of operation

If a failed OPEN switch is not detected, then the system continues operation, but impedance increases and overheating occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontinuous operationVSAvoidSSPC temperature
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSTemperature

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary testing of each switching device before normal operation to detect open failures in advance. By testing each device individually during initialization, the system can identify and address open failures before they cause increased impedance and overheating during operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback through test circuits that continuously monitor the state of each switching device. The test circuits provide feedback signals that indicate the operational status of each device, allowing the system to detect open failures and respond before thermal problems develop.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Reliability

If individual testing of each switching device is implemented, then open failures can be detected, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefailure detection accuracyVSAvoidtest circuit complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses universal test circuit designs that can be replicated for each switching device. The test circuits employ standard components and methodologies that are consistent across all parallel devices, reducing the complexity increment compared to custom individual testing solutions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the testing function into independent, modular test circuits for each switching device. Each test circuit is a self-contained unit that can be independently implemented and maintained, making the overall system manageable despite the increased number of components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentEP4492688A1Fail open detection
Publication Date: 2025.01.15 HAMILTON SUNDSTRAND CORP
  • EP4492688A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4492688A1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4492688A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system includes a solid state power controller (SSPC) including a plurality of switching devices (102) connected in parallel. A gate driver is operatively connected to control the plurality switching devices (102) together so all of the switching devices (102) in the plurality of switching devices (102) either close to pass current through the SSPC, or open to prevent current passing through the SSPC in a normal operation mode. A fail open test circuit is operatively connected to individually control a respective gate of each of the switching devices (102) in the plurality of switching devices (102) for testing the plurality of switching devices (102) individually for a fail OPEN condition.