Self-Service Terminal Compliance Check and Code Issuance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Self-service terminals (SSTs) often remain in a non-working state due to incomplete or overlooked maintenance and replenishment operations, as service personnel may not check fault information displayed on the operator panel.

Innovation Solution

A method is introduced that involves receiving notification of maintenance completion, performing a compliance check, and issuing a code upon successful check, which ensures the terminal is in a correct operational state before allowing it to return to transaction mode, and this code can be used for auditing and authorizing maintenance operations across a network of terminals.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If service personnel perform maintenance operations without checking fault information, then the maintenance process is quick and simple, but the terminal may remain in a non-working state

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemaintenance operation simplicityVSAvoidterminal operational state
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements automatic feedback mechanisms where the terminal system communicates maintenance status and fault information back to the management system. The compliance check module automatically verifies whether maintenance operations were successful by checking if fault conditions are resolved, providing continuous feedback without requiring manual inspection by service personnel.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The terminal system performs self-verification through automated compliance checks that automatically detect and report whether maintenance operations have resolved fault conditions. This self-service capability eliminates the need for service personnel to manually check fault information while ensuring the terminal is properly restored to working state.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If compliance checks are performed after every maintenance operation, then terminal reliability is improved, but operational time is increased

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveterminal operational stateVSAvoidmaintenance completion time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary compliance checks automatically as part of the maintenance operation workflow. The terminal system proactively verifies fault resolution during the maintenance process itself, rather than requiring a separate post-maintenance verification step, thus reducing total time while ensuring reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The manual mechanical process of service personnel checking fault information on operator panels is replaced with an automated electronic compliance check system. The terminal system automatically communicates with the management system to verify maintenance success, eliminating time-consuming manual inspection while maintaining high reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Loss of information

If fault information is displayed on the operator panel, then service personnel can identify issues, but they may still overlook the information

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefault information visibilityVSAvoidservice personnel attention
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of relying on service personnel to manually check and interpret fault information on operator panels, the system implements automated feedback where the terminal system directly communicates maintenance status and fault resolution information to the management system. This eliminates human error in information processing while maintaining complete fault information visibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The management system acts as an intermediary between the terminal system and service personnel. Rather than service personnel directly checking fault information on the terminal panel, the management system receives, processes, and communicates the relevant status information, reducing the cognitive load and attention required from service personnel while maintaining information accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS8118215B2Self-service terminal
Publication Date: 2012.02.21 NCR ATLEOS CORP
  • US8118215B2 patent drawing
  • US8118215B2 patent drawing
  • US8118215B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of operating a self-service terminal and a network of self-service terminals. The method comprises: receiving notification that a maintenance operation has been performed on the terminal; performing a compliance check on the terminal; and issuing a code in the event that the compliance check is successful. The code can be used to audit and/or validate that the maintenance operation was performed successfully and that the terminal was left in working order.