SSTR4 Agonists via 3-Aza-Bicyclic Core Design

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

There is a need for selective somatostatin receptor subtype 4 (SSTR4) agonists that exhibit high stability and oral efficacy, particularly non-peptidic agonists with reduced side effects due to high selectivity for SSTR4 over other receptor subtypes.

Innovation Solution

Development of 3-aza-bicyclo[3.1.0]hexane-6-carboxylic acid amide derivatives that act as agonists for SSTR4, providing high metabolic stability and selectivity for SSTR4 receptors, thereby reducing the likelihood of side effects and enhancing pharmacokinetic properties.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Stability of the object's composition

If non-peptidic agonists are developed for SSTR4, then metabolic stability is improved, but selectivity over other receptor subtypes deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemetabolic stabilityVSAvoidselectivity
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by introducing specific substituent patterns at defined positions on the bicyclic core structure. Different substituents (R1-R6) are placed at specific locations to optimize both metabolic stability and receptor selectivity simultaneously, rather than treating the molecule as a uniform entity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs parameter changes by systematically varying chemical parameters such as substituent types, ring fusion configurations, and stereochemistry to achieve the desired balance between metabolic stability and selectivity. Specific embodiments demonstrate how modifying these parameters leads to improved compound performance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Object-affected harmful factors

If high selectivity for SSTR4 is achieved, then side effects are reduced, but development complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveside effectsVSAvoiddevelopment complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies segmentation by dividing the molecular structure into distinct functional regions: a bicyclic core providing structural stability and selectivity, and substituent groups (R1-R6) that can be independently optimized. This modular approach allows systematic development while managing complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent achieves universality through a platform approach where the bicyclic core structure serves multiple functions: providing metabolic stability, enabling receptor selectivity, and allowing for diverse substituent combinations. This multi-functional core simplifies the overall development process

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Ease of operation

If oral efficacy is improved, then bioavailability increases, but metabolic stability may deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoral efficacyVSAvoidmetabolic stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs parameter changes by modifying physicochemical properties such as lipophilicity, molecular weight, and hydrogen bonding capacity through specific substituent selections. These parameter adjustments optimize oral absorption while maintaining metabolic stability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS10675268B2Somatostatin receptor subtype 4 (SSTR4) agonists
Publication Date: 2020.06.09 CENTREXION THERAPEUTICS CORP
  • US10675268B2 patent drawing
  • US10675268B2 patent drawing
  • US10675268B2 patent drawing

AI summary

3-aza-bicyclo[3.1.0]hexane-6-carboxylic acid amide derivatives which are agonists of somatostatin receptor subtype 4 (SSTR4), useful for preventing or treating medical disorders related to SSTR4.