Stabilizer Bar Hardened End Portions Weight Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing stabilizer bars for vehicles face issues with reduced loading capacity at the ends due to geometric and material structure reasons, leading to potential material failure and weight inefficiencies, particularly under high loads and thin material conditions.

Innovation Solution

A hardened stabilizer bar with a torsion spring portion and bent arms, featuring formed end portions with through-openings, is produced using a process of hardening and tempering, achieving high strength values of at least 1000 MPa and 800 MPa respectively, allowing for reduced wall thickness and improved tightness properties.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Weight of moving object

If the wall thickness of end portions is reduced to decrease weight, then the loading capacity and structural integrity deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveweight of stabilizer barVSAvoidloading capacity of end portions
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of moving objectVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies heat treatment parameters (temperature, time, atmosphere) to transform the material structure of end portions, changing the hardness and strength characteristics without altering geometric dimensions. This allows maintaining reduced wall thickness while achieving sufficient loading capacity through material property modification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies selective heat treatment only to end portions rather than the entire stabilizer bar. This creates local quality enhancement where end portions achieve high hardness (400-600 HV) while other sections maintain original properties, optimizing the weight-strength trade-off by strengthening only where needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Ease of manufacture

If conventional forming and cooling processes are used, then production simplicity is maintained, but material structure defects and reduced loading capacity occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction simplicityVSAvoidloading capacity of end portions
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent modifies the cooling rate parameter from conventional fast cooling to controlled slow cooling (1-10°C/min) in the heat treatment process. This parameter change transforms the material structure to achieve high hardness and eliminates defects associated with rapid cooling, while maintaining process simplicity through a single integrated heat treatment operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Strength

If additional reinforcements are added to end portions to increase loading capacity, then structural integrity improves, but weight increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveloading capacity of end portionsVSAvoidweight of stabilizer bar
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes material properties through heat treatment parameters rather than adding geometric reinforcements. By controlling temperature (200-500°C) and cooling rate, the end portions achieve enhanced hardness (400-600 HV) and strength, eliminating the need for additional material or structural additions that would increase weight.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Strength

If high strength is achieved through hardening, then loading capacity improves, but ductility and toughness deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehardness of end portionsVSAvoidductility and toughness
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent optimizes the temperature parameter range (200-500°C) and cooling rate (1-10°C/min) to achieve a balanced material structure. This controlled parameter change produces high hardness (400-600 HV) while maintaining adequate ductility and toughness, avoiding the brittleness associated with excessive hardening.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies heat treatment at moderate temperature ranges rather than extreme temperatures. This partial action approach achieves sufficient hardness enhancement without over-hardening, thereby maintaining material reliability and preventing excessive brittleness that would result from more aggressive hardening processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution enables the stabilizer bar to withstand high loads with a longer service life, reducing weight while maintaining loading capacity, and ensures reliable production with high process efficiency and gas-tightness.

Implementation Method 1

A hardened stabilizer bar for a chassis of a motor vehicle comprises: a torsion spring portion and two arms bent away from the torsion spring portion, wherein the arms each comprise a formed end portion with a through-opening and a tubular portion, wherein the torsion spring portion comprises a hardened structure with a strength of at least 1000 MPa (megapascals), and wherein the formed end portions comprise a hardened structure with a strength of at least 800 MPa

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHardening and tempering: Heat Treatment

Data Source

PatentUS10144264B2Stabilizer bar and process of producing a stabilizer bar
Publication Date: 2018.12.04 MUHR UND BENNDER KG
  • US10144264B2 patent drawing
  • US10144264B2 patent drawing
  • US10144264B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A stabilizer bar for a chassis of a motor vehicle comprises a torsion spring portion and two arms bent away from the torsion spring portion; wherein the arms each comprise a formed end portion with a through-opening and a tubular portion, wherein the torsion spring portion comprises a hardened structure with a strength of at least 1000 MPa; and wherein the formed end portions comprise a hardened structure with a strength of at least 800 MPa. A process of producing a corresponding stabilizer is further disclosed.