Aircraft Stabilizer Energy Attenuation via Adaptable Sections

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional tail skids on aircraft stabilizers absorb impact loads but induce drag, require additional support, and limit the maximum dimensions and ground clearance of the stabilizer.

Innovation Solution

Incorporating an energy attenuating portion with adaptable sections that are rigid in certain directions and compressible in others, integrated within the stabilizer's aerodynamic design, allowing for a spectrum of stiffness metrics to manage impact and aerodynamic loads without the need for tail skids.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional tail skids are used to absorb impact loads, then energy absorption capability is improved, but drag is increased and additional support structure is required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy absorption capabilityVSAvoiddrag
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the energy absorption function with the stabilizer structure itself by integrating an adaptable section into the stabilizer. This eliminates the need for separate tail skids while maintaining impact protection, thereby reducing drag without sacrificing energy absorption capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The stabilizer is designed to perform multiple functions: it provides aerodynamic stability during flight and absorbs impact energy during landing. The adaptable section enables the stabilizer to transition between these functions by changing its stiffness characteristics based on operational conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Reliability

If traditional tail skids are used to absorb impact loads, then energy absorption capability is improved, but device complexity is increased due to additional support structure

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy absorption capabilityVSAvoidsupport structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines the energy absorption function into the stabilizer structure itself, eliminating the need for separate tail skids and their associated support structures. This integration reduces device complexity while maintaining impact protection capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The stabilizer serves itself by incorporating an adaptable section that provides energy absorption capability inherently. The stabilizer structure performs both its primary aerodynamic function and the secondary function of impact energy absorption, eliminating the need for additional dedicated components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Reliability

If traditional tail skids are used to absorb impact loads, then energy absorption capability is improved, but maximum dimensions and ground clearance are limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy absorption capabilityVSAvoidstabilizer dimensions
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLength of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

By integrating the energy absorption function into the stabilizer structure itself through the adaptable section, the patent eliminates the need for extended tail skids and their support structures. This allows for increased stabilizer dimensions and improved ground clearance while maintaining impact protection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Reliability

If adaptable section with varying stiffness is used, then energy attenuation is improved, but manufacturing complexity is increased

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy attenuationVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The adaptable section utilizes materials or structures whose stiffness parameters can be varied to achieve different mechanical properties in different directions. This allows the stabilizer to be rigid in directions perpendicular to the impact force while being compressible in the direction of impact, optimizing energy attenuation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs composite materials or structures with anisotropic properties that provide different stiffness characteristics in different directions. This enables the adaptable section to exhibit rigid behavior in certain directions while remaining compressible in others, achieving superior energy attenuation through material selection rather than complex geometry.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution minimizes damage to the aircraft's structure during impact, reduces part counts and weight, and enhances aerodynamic performance by integrating energy attenuation within the stabilizer's sleek design, enabling increased surface area and improved landing capabilities.

Implementation Method 1

the adaptable section is configured to be rigid in directions perpendicular to the direction of the impact load vector and compressible in the direction of the impact load vector

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCompression: Compression

Implementation Method 2

In certain implementations, the adaptable section may be configured to attenuate energy from an impact load vector

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEnergy attenuation: Deformation

Data Source

PatentUS11834177B2Energy attenuation stabilizers and methods
Publication Date: 2023.12.05 TEXTRON INNOVATIONS INC
  • US11834177B2 patent drawing
  • US11834177B2 patent drawing
  • US11834177B2 patent drawing

AI summary

According to one implementation of the present disclosure, a stabilizer of an aircraft includes an energy attenuating portion. The energy attenuating portion includes first and second edge sections separated by an adaptable section. The adaptable section may be rigid in a first range of directions and compressible in a second range of directions.