Watercraft Stabilizer Fin Lateral Displacement for Roll Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional active fin stabilizer systems face challenges in applying sufficient force to stabilize modern, faster watercrafts at anchor or high speeds without causing excessive sway and yaw, which are uncomfortable and negatively impact the vessel's stability.

Innovation Solution

The stabilizer device features a fin blade with a displacement mechanism that includes a link element and actuator, allowing the fin to pivot and displace laterally, optimizing the force vector to counteract roll movements more effectively, reducing unwanted movements like sway and yaw.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Force

If very large traditional fins are used to reach the desired roll reduction force, then the roll stabilization force is improved, but the sway and yaw effects on the watercraft increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveroll reduction forceVSAvoidsway and yaw effects
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The fin blade is divided into multiple independent fin elements (first fin element, second fin element, third fin element) that can be controlled independently. This segmentation allows the system to apply roll stabilization force through coordinated movement of multiple smaller elements rather than one large fin, reducing the harmful sway and yaw effects while maintaining the necessary roll reduction force.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs dynamic control of fin element positions and angles through actuators. The fin elements can adjust their deployment and orientation in real-time based on roll conditions, allowing the system to optimize the force vector to maximize roll stabilization while minimizing unwanted sway and yaw. This dynamic adaptation resolves the contradiction by making the fin system responsive rather than static.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Force

If the fin blade is made larger to apply sufficient force for modern fast watercrafts, then the force impulse is improved, but the drag on the watercraft increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveforce impulseVSAvoiddrag
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

By dividing the fin blade into multiple smaller fin elements, the system achieves the necessary total force impulse through coordinated action of several elements rather than one large continuous fin. This segmentation reduces the overall drag area while maintaining the force-generating capability, as the gaps between elements reduce wetted surface area and form drag.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The fin elements operate through periodic deployment and retraction cycles, applying force impulses only when needed for roll stabilization. This periodic action allows the system to achieve the necessary force impulse over time without maintaining constant large fin deployment, thereby reducing continuous drag while preserving the ability to deliver strong stabilizing forces when required.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

3Speed

If the fin moves faster to apply counter force in shorter time periods, then the response time is improved, but the total force impulse decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefin movement speedVSAvoidtotal force impulse
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The segmentation of the fin blade into multiple elements allows different portions to be actuated at different times and with different velocities. This enables the system to maintain high response speed through rapid actuation of individual elements while accumulating the necessary total force impulse through the combined action of all elements over the stabilization cycle.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

While individual fin elements move rapidly, the system maintains continuous useful action through coordinated sequencing of multiple elements. As one element completes its stroke, another begins, ensuring that the force application is continuous rather than intermittent. This continuity preserves the total force impulse despite the high speed of individual element movements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration enhances the stabilizer's efficiency by increasing the vertical component of the force vector, allowing a larger force to be applied with a smaller fin area, reducing drag, and minimizing unwanted movements, thus improving stability without increasing drag or causing the vessel to turn perpendicular to waves.

Implementation Method 1

a fin blade displacement means (30) connected to said first fin connection element (61) and said hull element (38) and arranged for displacing said first fin connection point (62) a first displacement (3), in parallel with a lower surface of said hull (2), and perpendicular to said hull forward direction (fh)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical Force: Mechanical Force

Implementation Method 2

a fin displacement actuator (36) arranged to reversibly pivot said link element (35) about a second axis (A2) fixed relative to the hull element (38)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical Force: Mechanical Force

Implementation Method 3

The force is a result of the size of fin and the speed the fin is moved, and as an opposite, the faster the fin is moved, the shorter a time period the force can be applied

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydrodynamic Force: Drag

Data Source

PatentEP3507189B1Stabilizer fin for a watercraft
Publication Date: 2023.12.13 SLEIPNER MOTOR AS
  • EP3507189B1 patent drawingFigure 1a~2b
  • EP3507189B1 patent drawingFigure 3a~3c
  • EP3507189B1 patent drawingFigure 4a~4b

AI summary

Stabilizer device (10) for a watercraft with a hull (2), wherein the stabilizer device (10) comprises; - a fin blade (20) with a fin base (11), a fin tip (12), a leading edge (52), and a trailing edge (53), wherein a blade forward direction (fb) is defined from the trailing edge (53) to the leading edge (52) at the fin base (11), wherein the fin blade (20) comprises a first fin connection element (61) connected to the fin base (11) in a first connection point (62) - a hull element (38) arranged to be fixed to the hull (2) with a hull forward direction (fh) in a forward direction of the hull (2), and - a fin blade displacement means (30) connected to the first fin connection element (61) and the hull element (38) and arranged for displacing the first fin connection point (62) a first displacement (3), in parallel with a lower surface of said hull (2), and perpendicular to said hull forward direction (fh).