Stabilizer Link Ball Joint Friction Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing stabilizer links suffer from low sealing performance and noise issues due to irregular rotating frictional resistances in ball joints, particularly at the lower end, which leads to increased tension in the dust cover and invasion of impurities.

Innovation Solution

A stabilizer link design that incorporates a friction-providing unit with grooves and O-rings to create varying rotational frictional resistances between the ball studs and dust covers, ensuring higher resistance at the lower end than the upper end, thereby reducing tension and improving sealing performance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the ball joint sections are designed with standard frictional resistance, then the upper ball joint rotates smoothly, but the lower ball joint experiences insufficient frictional resistance leading to dust cover tension and sealing failure

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesealing performanceVSAvoidrotating frictional resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies different frictional resistance characteristics to different locations of the ball stud. The lower ball stud is equipped with a friction-providing unit (grooves and O-rings) that generates higher rotating frictional resistance, while the upper ball stud maintains standard frictional resistance. This local differentiation resolves the contradiction by providing the necessary frictional resistance at the lower section to prevent dust cover tension and sealing failure, while maintaining smooth rotation at the upper section.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Ease of operation

If the lower ball joint has low rotating frictional resistance, then rotation is easier, but the dust cover tension increases causing impurity invasion and noise

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverotating frictional resistanceVSAvoidimpurity invasion
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The friction-providing unit with grooves and O-rings is specifically installed on the lower ball stud to create localized high frictional resistance. This prevents the dust cover from experiencing excessive tension during rotation, thereby maintaining the sealing performance and preventing impurity invasion and noise at the lower ball joint section.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent converts the potentially harmful effect of friction (which could impede rotation) into a beneficial force at the lower ball joint. By intentionally increasing the rotating frictional resistance at the lower section through the friction-providing unit, the system prevents dust cover tension and sealing failure, transforming friction from a harmful resistance into a protective mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

3Reliability

If friction-providing units are added to increase rotating frictional resistance, then sealing performance improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesealing performanceVSAvoidstructure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of modifying the entire ball joint system, the friction-providing unit is applied locally only to the lower ball stud where it is most needed. This selective application maintains the simplicity of the overall structure while achieving the desired improvement in sealing performance, minimizing the increase in device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The design effectively minimizes impurity invasion and noise by maintaining reduced tension in the dust cover and enhancing sealing performance at the lower end of the stabilizer link.

Implementation Method 1

The friction-providing unit provides predetermined amounts of rotating frictional resistance to the ball studs when the ball studs rotate with respect to the link such that the rotating frictional resistance of the ball stud at the lower end of the link is greater than the rotating frictional resistance of the ball stud at the upper end of the link.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Implementation Method 2

dust covers assembled between circumferences of the ball sockets and middle sections of the ball studs, the dust covers preventing impurities from invading the ball sockets

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSealing:

Data Source

PatentUS9302560B2Stabilizer link
Publication Date: 2016.04.05 HYUNDAI MOTOR CO LTD
  • US9302560B2 patent drawing
  • US9302560B2 patent drawing
  • US9302560B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A stabilizer link apparatus may include ball studs having balls at terminals thereof, a link having ball sockets at upper and lower ends thereof, the balls being rotatably accommodated in the ball sockets, dust covers assembled between circumferences of the ball sockets and middle sections of the ball studs, the dust covers preventing impurities from invading the ball sockets, and friction-providing unit engaged between the ball stud and the link, wherein the friction-providing unit provide predetermined amounts of rotating frictional resistance to the ball studs when the ball studs rotate with respect to the link such that the rotating frictional resistance of the ball stud at the lower end of the link is greater than the rotating frictional resistance of the ball stud at the upper end of the link.