Aircraft Stabilizer System Tail Rotor Thrust Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional single rotor helicopters face challenges in maintaining proper heading due to reaction torque from the main lifting rotor, which reduces thrust force from the tail rotor, leading to decreased performance and efficiency.

Innovation Solution

A stabilizer system with a vertically oriented stabilizer and airflow modifiers like strakes is introduced, reducing the stabilizer's profile and surface area to enhance thrust force generation and counteract reaction torque, allowing for improved maneuverability and reduced power consumption.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Force

If a traditional vertically oriented stabilizer is used, then aircraft stability is provided, but the stabilizer blocks airflow from the tail rotor resulting in reduced thrust force

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetail rotor thrust forceVSAvoidairflow obstruction
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the stabilizer fin from the airflow path of the tail rotor by repositioning it to the bottom of the tail boom, below the tail rotor. This separation eliminates the harmful interaction where the stabilizer blocked tail rotor airflow, allowing the stabilizer to provide directional stability without obstructing the thrust-generating airflow from the tail rotor.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The stabilizer is repositioned from a vertical orientation that intersected the horizontal airflow path to a horizontal orientation at the bottom of the tail boom. This dimensional change in positioning and orientation removes the stabilizer from the critical airflow path while maintaining its stabilizing function through a different spatial configuration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Force

If the stabilizer profile is reduced, then tail rotor thrust is enhanced, but stabilizer effectiveness may be compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetail rotor thrust forceVSAvoidaircraft directional stability
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

By extracting the stabilizer from the tail rotor's airflow path and repositioning it to the bottom of the tail boom, the stabilizer can maintain its full profile and effectiveness without being constrained by the need to minimize obstruction. The stabilizer and tail rotor operate in separate airflow domains, allowing both to function at optimal performance levels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The aerodynamic functions are segmented into separate components: the stabilizer fin at the bottom handles directional stability, while the tail rotor handles thrust generation. This functional segmentation allows each component to be optimized independently without compromise, as they no longer compete for the same airflow resources.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Force

If the stabilizer is repositioned below the tail rotor, then airflow obstruction is minimized, but structural complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetail rotor thrust forceVSAvoidstabilizer system configuration
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The bottom of the tail boom structure serves multiple functions: it provides the mounting location for the stabilizer fin, supports the tail rotor assembly above it, and maintains the aerodynamic streamline of the aircraft. This multi-functional use of the tail boom structure avoids adding separate complex support systems while achieving the repositioned stabilizer configuration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The stabilizer system increases thrust forces, reduces tail rotor power requirements, and enhances aircraft handling, control safety, and payload capacity by minimizing airflow obstruction and optimizing aerodynamics.

Implementation Method 1

The stabilizer system may further include one or more airflow modifiers, such as strakes, mounted on a tail section of the aircraft

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAerodynamic force generation: Aerofoil

Implementation Method 2

The vertical stabilizer can allow a tail rotor of the aircraft to produce relatively large thrust forces

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAirflow generation: Jet

Data Source

PatentUS8376265B2Aircraft stabilizer system and methods of using the same
Publication Date: 2013.02.19 BLR AEROSPACE LLC
  • US8376265B2 patent drawing
  • US8376265B2 patent drawing
  • US8376265B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An aircraft can include a tail section and a stabilizing system coupled to the tail section. The stabilizing system has a vertical stabilizer and at least one strake that cooperate to generate forces that compensate for a reaction torque generated by a main lifting rotor that produces lifting forces when the aircraft is in flight. Methods for improving aircraft performance include installing the at least one strake and retrofitting of a vertical stabilizer to increase thrust forces produced by a tail rotor.