STABLE MRI Pulse Reduces RF Peak Power via Segmentation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at high magnetic fields faces signal losses due to increased B1 inhomogeneity, and existing slice-selective adiabatic pulses require high RF amplitude and gradient strength, limiting their utility to specific applications.

Innovation Solution

The development of a Slice-selective Tunable-flip Adiabatic Low peak-power Excitation (STABLE) pulse, which uses a BIR-4 envelope with slowly varying amplitude and frequency modulation functions, sampled by multiple subpulses to achieve spatial selectivity with lower RF peak power requirements and immunity to B1 variations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If existing slice-selective adiabatic pulses are used, then adiabatic excitation is achieved, but high RF amplitude and gradient strength are required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadiabatic excitationVSAvoidRF amplitude
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSPower

Solution Approach 1:

The RF pulse is divided into multiple subpulses (e.g., 8-32 subpulses) that are sampled from a BIR-4 envelope. Each subpulse is a discrete component that collectively achieves the adiabatic effect. This segmentation allows the pulse to maintain adiabaticity while reducing peak power requirements compared to conventional single-pulse approaches.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The pulse employs dynamic amplitude and frequency modulation functions that vary smoothly over time. The envelope is continuously adjusted during the pulse duration to maintain adiabatic conditions. This dynamic adjustment enables the system to achieve reliable adiabatic excitation with lower peak RF power than static pulse designs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If existing slice-selective adiabatic pulses are used, then adiabatic excitation is achieved, but high gradient strength is required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadiabatic excitationVSAvoidgradient strength
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The pulse sequence is segmented into multiple subpulses with associated gradient lobes. By distributing the gradient action across multiple smaller segments rather than requiring a single strong gradient pulse, the system achieves adiabatic excitation with reduced peak gradient strength requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The frequency modulation function of the envelope is dynamically adjusted during the pulse. By changing the frequency parameters of individual subpulses according to the BIR-4 envelope, the system achieves adiabaticity without requiring proportionally high gradient strengths. The parameter modulation compensates for the reduced gradient amplitude.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of operation

If conventional RF pulses are used, then simple excitation is achieved, but B1 inhomogeneity causes signal losses at high magnetic fields

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveexcitation simplicityVSAvoidsignal quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses a computationally intensive but physically simple BIR-4 envelope sampled by discrete subpulses. Rather than using complex hardware or high power, the solution employs a mathematically optimized pulse shape that can be implemented with standard RF amplifiers. The envelope function acts as a disposable computational model that achieves robustness against B1 inhomogeneity without requiring excessive power.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Solution Approach 2:

The pulse employs amplitude and frequency modulation functions that are smoothly varying parameters. By continuously adjusting these parameters according to the BIR-4 envelope, the system creates a pulse that is insensitive to B1 inhomogeneity. The parameter modulation transforms a simple excitation into a robust one that maintains signal quality across varying B1 conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Reliability

If high RF peak power is used, then adiabaticity is achieved, but device complexity and safety concerns increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveadiabaticityVSAvoidRF power requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The high-power adiabatic pulse is segmented into multiple low-power subpulses. Instead of delivering a single high-power pulse, the system uses 8-32 smaller subpulses that collectively achieve the same adiabatic effect. This segmentation reduces peak power requirements while maintaining device simplicity, as standard RF amplifiers can handle the lower individual pulse powers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The pulse employs periodic sampling of the BIR-4 envelope through discrete subpulses. By using periodic or near-periodic subpulse structures, the system achieves adiabaticity through repeated low-power excitations rather than a single high-power event. This periodic action pattern allows standard hardware to achieve adiabatic effects that would otherwise require complex high-power systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The STABLE pulse achieves adiabatic slice-selection with reduced RF peak power, maintaining image quality across a range of B1 values and providing improved immunity to chemical shift localization errors, making it suitable for broader applications including human studies at high magnetic fields.

Implementation Method 1

amplitude and frequency modulation functions of the BIR-4 envelope are slowly varying with respect to the duration of the subpulses

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdiabatic condition:

Implementation Method 2

exciting nuclear spins in the object with a RF magnetic field (B1)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRF magnetic field excitation:

Implementation Method 3

adiabatic slice-selection with reduced RF peak power, maintaining image quality across a range of B1 values

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdiabatic pulse:

Implementation Method 4

faces signal losses due to increased B1 inhomogeneity

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectB1 inhomogeneity compensation:

Implementation Method 5

Through the use of magnetic gradient and phase encoding of the excited magnetization, detected signals can be spatially localized in three dimensions

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic gradient encoding:

Implementation Method 6

detecting signals emitted by the excited spins as they precess within the magnetic field (B0)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpin precession: Precession

Data Source

PatentUS7683618B2Slice-selective tunable-flip adiabatic low peak power excitation
Publication Date: 2010.03.23 THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIV
  • US7683618B2 patent drawing
  • US7683618B2 patent drawing
  • US7683618B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A manifestation of the invention provides a method for slice selective excitation for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). A B0 field is applied. A STABLE pulse comprising of a BIR-4 envelope sampled by a plurality of subpulses with a duration is applied, where amplitude and frequency modulation functions of the BIR-4 envelope are slowly varying with respect to the duration of the subpulses. A portion of k-space is read out to obtain k-space data. The STABLE pulse and readout are repeated until sufficient k-space has been acquired. A Fourier Transform of the k-space data is taken.