Stack Trace Search System for Debugging

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Programmers face difficulties in understanding stack traces, as they often include large amounts of irrelevant or common data, making it hard to identify specific errors and find relevant information for debugging.

Innovation Solution

An error management system that parses stack traces to identify valuable terms and phrases, removes irrelevant data, and searches a class mapping table and error discussion database to provide prioritized search results, allowing users to access relevant source code and user-generated postings.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If a stack trace includes complete execution information, then debugging accuracy is improved, but information complexity increases making it difficult to understand

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedebugging accuracyVSAvoidinformation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the stack trace information by identifying and separating relevant error-causing frames from irrelevant common frames. The system divides the complete stack trace into meaningful portions, presenting only the segments that are actually useful for debugging the specific error, thereby reducing information complexity while preserving debugging accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts and removes common, irrelevant frames from the stack trace that do not contribute to understanding the specific error. By taking out these redundant elements (such as standard library calls or common framework methods), the system reduces the overall complexity of the information presented to the programmer while maintaining the essential debugging information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Reliability

If a stack trace includes all execution frames, then error identification completeness is improved, but search efficiency deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveerror identification completenessVSAvoidsearch efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-processing the stack trace to identify and remove common frames before the programmer needs to search for error information. This advance filtering action reduces the search space, allowing programmers to quickly locate relevant error information without wading through irrelevant common frames, thereby improving search efficiency while maintaining error identification completeness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary processing layer that acts as a mediator between the complete stack trace and the programmer. This intermediary system automatically filters, prioritizes, and presents only the relevant error-causing frames, eliminating the need for programmers to manually search through all execution frames while ensuring that no critical error information is lost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Loss of information

If a stack trace shows detailed call information, then debugging information completeness is improved, but time to analyze the error increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedebugging information completenessVSAvoidanalysis time
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by providing different levels of information detail in different parts of the error presentation. Critical error-causing frames are presented with full detail and prominence, while common non-critical frames are minimized or omitted. This localized differentiation of information quality allows programmers to quickly grasp the essential error information without spending time analyzing irrelevant detailed information from common frames.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs partial action by selectively including only the necessary portion of stack trace information required for debugging the specific error. Rather than presenting the complete stack trace with all its details, the system includes just enough information (the error-causing frames and their immediate context) to enable effective debugging, thereby reducing analysis time while maintaining information completeness for the critical elements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS20240054137A1Stack trace search
Publication Date: 2024.02.15 PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES INC
  • US20240054137A1 patent drawing
  • US20240054137A1 patent drawing
  • US20240054137A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An error management system can provide search results based on a received stack trace. For example, the error management system receives, from a client device, a search query including a stack trace. The error management system parses the search query to identify at least a first class and one or more errors associated with the first class, yielding a parsed search query. The error management system searches a class mapping table based on the parsed search query. The class mapping table includes a listing of classes and corresponding links to source code. The error management system searches an error discussion database based on the parsed search query. The error discussion database includes one or more user generated postings regarding programming errors. The error management system provides, to the client device, search results resulting from searching the class mapping table and the error discussion database.