Stackable Bi-Directional Battery Balancer

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing battery balancing systems are inefficient in terms of time and energy, as they often involve passive energy dissipation, unidirectional charge transfer, and are not capable of simultaneous balancing of multiple cells connected in series, limiting the total useful capacity and longevity of battery packs.

Innovation Solution

A bi-directional battery balancing system using transformer connections that allows for simultaneous balancing of multiple cells in a stack, with each cell within a sub-stack being balanced independently and efficiently, using a single serial port for control, enabling charge transfer between adjacent sub-stacks to equalize state of charge across all cells.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If passive balancing is used to discharge cells with higher SOC, then cell voltage equality is achieved, but energy is dissipated as heat causing high energy loss

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecell voltage equalityVSAvoidenergy dissipation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

An intermediary energy storage element (capacitor or inductor) is introduced to temporarily store energy from cells with higher SOC and transfer it to cells with lower SOC. This mediator enables direct energy transfer between cells without dissipating energy as heat, resolving the contradiction between achieving cell voltage equality and minimizing energy loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of discarding excess energy from overcharged cells as heat (passive balancing), the system recovers this energy by transferring it to undercharged cells through active balancing circuits. The energy that would have been wasted is now reused, simultaneously achieving cell equality and energy conservation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

2Device complexity

If unidirectional balancing systems are used, then charge transfer is simplified, but balancing effectiveness is reduced as cells cannot both add and withdraw charge

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecharge transfer controlVSAvoidbalancing effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The balancing system transitions from a static unidirectional charge transfer approach to a dynamic bidirectional approach. Power electronic switches (such as MOSFETs or IGBTs) enable the system to dynamically reverse charge flow direction, allowing cells to both add and withdraw charge as needed. This dynamic capability improves balancing effectiveness while maintaining manageable system complexity through intelligent control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Device complexity

If sequential balancing of cells is performed, then circuit complexity is reduced, but balancing time increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecircuit configurationVSAvoidbalancing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The battery pack is segmented into multiple independent balancing circuits, each capable of operating autonomously on a specific cell or cell group. This segmentation allows parallel balancing operations across multiple cells simultaneously, dramatically reducing total balancing time while keeping each individual circuit relatively simple and manageable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables continuous balancing action across all cells by operating multiple balancing circuits in parallel rather than sequentially. All cells undergo balancing simultaneously without idle time between operations, maximizing the utilization of balancing resources and minimizing total balancing time while maintaining reasonable circuit complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

4Power

If series connected cells are used to achieve high voltage, then power density increases, but the total useful capacity is limited by the weakest cell

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower densityVSAvoidtotal useful capacity
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

A feedback mechanism continuously monitors the state of charge and voltage of each cell in the series connection. Based on this real-time feedback, the balancing system actively adjusts charge distribution to ensure all cells operate within their optimal capacity ranges. This feedback control prevents the weakest cell from limiting the overall pack capacity, allowing the battery system to fully utilize the capacity of all cells while maintaining high voltage and power density.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach reduces balancing time and energy wastage, extends battery life by ensuring all cells operate within a balanced state of charge, and allows for the support of a theoretically unlimited number of cells through a single communication port, enhancing power efficiency and capacity utilization.

Implementation Method 1

A first cell balancer of the plurality of cell balancers may include a transformer having a primary winding and a secondary winding

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Data Source

PatentEP2538519B1Stackable bi-directional multicell battery balancer
Publication Date: 2022.12.07 ANALOG DEVICES INT UNLTD CO
  • EP2538519B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2b
  • EP2538519B1 patent drawingFigure 3
  • EP2538519B1 patent drawingFigure 4

AI summary

A battery balancing system includes at least one sub-stack, each sub-stack comprising a plurality of cells connected in series. The system also includes a balancing module for each sub-stack comprising an independent bidirectional balancer for each cell in the sub-stack. The system includes a daisy chained stackable serial port. The balancing system senses a state of charge (SOC) of each cell in each sub-stack. The average SOC of the sub-stack is determined. For a weak cell, additional charge is provided from its respective sub-stack during the discharging of the battery. For a strong cell, additional charge is removed and provided to its respective sub-stack during discharging of the battery. Any number of sub-stacks can be stacked in series while maintaining the same serial control, allowing a theoretically unlimited number of cells to be supported from a single communication port without the need for additional digital isolators.