Stackable Cable Hanger with Arcuate Tray and Latching Feature

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing cable supports for high data transmission Cat 5 or 5e cables are limited in weight capacity, number of cables they can support, and types of connections, and often fail to maintain the integrity of cables in air handling spaces, leading to issues like cross-talk and data loss due to improper bending and stress.

Innovation Solution

A stackable cable hanger with an arcuate cable tray and extendable arms that can support up to 90 Cat 5e cables, allowing for secure attachment to various supports and ensuring a proper bend radius, constructed from materials suitable for air handling spaces, with tie-down loops for cable security and easy stacking for multiple tiers.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If conventional J-hooks are used to support Cat 5 or 5e cables, then the installation is simple, but the weight capacity is limited and the number of cables that can be supported is restricted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of cables supportedVSAvoidweight capacity
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The cable support is divided into modular components (cable tray, arms, mounting brackets) that can be assembled in various configurations. This segmentation allows the system to support increasing numbers of cables by adding more modules while maintaining individual component strength requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention transitions from single-point support (J-hooks) to distributed multi-point support through an extended cable tray structure with multiple arms. This dimensional expansion allows weight and cable quantity to be distributed across multiple support points, increasing both capacity and strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Reliability

If cables are routed without proper support in air handling spaces, then installation is easier, but cable integrity is compromised leading to cross-talk and data loss

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecable integrityVSAvoidsupport structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The cable tray incorporates arcuate surfaces and curved transition zones that guide cables through smooth bends rather than sharp angles. This curvature prevents cable kinking and maintains proper bend radius, protecting cable integrity while the modular design keeps overall complexity manageable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

Solution Approach 2:

The support structure is designed with adjustable parameters including arm length, tray depth, and mounting position. These configurable parameters allow optimization of cable routing paths to maintain proper bend radius and tension in air handling spaces, ensuring reliability without requiring overly complex fixed structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Quantity of substance

If multiple tiers of cable bundles are supported, then cable capacity increases, but the structure becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetotal cable capacityVSAvoidstacking structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The cable support system is segmented into standardized modular units that can be vertically stacked to create multiple tiers. Each module contains integrated mounting features and alignment mechanisms, allowing complex multi-tier configurations to be assembled from simple repeating units, thereby increasing cable capacity without proportionally increasing structural complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Reliability

If a wide cable tray is used to spread cable bundles, then cable integrity is maintained, but the device size increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecable integrityVSAvoidcable tray area
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The cable tray width and depth are optimized locally based on cable bundle requirements. The tray provides maximum width where cables need to be spread to maintain integrity, while the arms and mounting structures are minimized in size. This local optimization maintains cable integrity without requiring the entire structure to be unnecessarily large.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS10920910B1Stackable cable hanger with latching feature
Publication Date: 2021.02.16 ARLINGTON IND INC
  • US10920910B1 patent drawing
  • US10920910B1 patent drawing
  • US10920910B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A stackable cable hanger for supporting bundles of communications cables with the center radius of the bundle spread over the opening of the cable hanger. The cable hanger includes a cable tray with an upward extending inner arm and an upward extending outer arm. A cable tray extends between the arms. An arcuate surface on the cable tray provides a gentle bend radius to any cable bundles laid on the tray. Arcuate transitions on lateral ends of the cable tray provide a curved transition between the tray and the arms. Mounting holes are on the top and bottom of the inner arm enable attachment of the hanger to a support surface and vertical stacking of multiple hangers to create multiple tiers of cable bundles. A tie down loop on the inner arm and on the outer arm enables closure of the hanger opening with a cable tie or similar closure device.