Stackable Shopping Cart Frame with Offset Rear Sections

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing shopping trolleys face challenges in efficiently stacking multiple units closely to save space during transport, particularly when carrying large-volume top storage devices that require sufficient support to prevent bending and vibrations.

Innovation Solution

The design modifies the shopping trolley's chassis by bending the upper and lower frame elements together, creating a larger space between the upper and lower storage devices, and offsetting the rear and front frame sections to allow for tight stacking, with the lower storage device's section sloping rearwardly to accommodate two crates securely.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Volume of moving object

If the upper storage device is made large-volume, then the cargo capacity is improved, but the support structure becomes more complex and vulnerable to bending and vibrations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveupper storage device volumeVSAvoidsupport structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The support structure is divided into multiple frame sections (front frame section, rear frame section, cross-connecting piece) that work together to support the upper storage device. Each segment performs a specific structural function, distributing the load and reducing complexity of any single component.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The frame sections are nested within the chassis structure, with the support frames integrated into the overall cart framework. The cross-connecting piece connects the front and rear frame sections, creating a nested structural arrangement that provides support while maintaining structural efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

2Area of stationary object

If the shopping carts are stacked closely, then the transport space efficiency is improved, but the stacking distance becomes very narrow requiring precise structural alignment

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransport space occupancyVSAvoidstacking distance precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The frame sections are designed with asymmetric configurations where the front frame section and rear frame section have different orientations and positions. This asymmetric design allows the carts to interlock in a specific stacked arrangement, achieving tight stacking while maintaining structural stability through the offset positioning of frame elements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

The solution moves the stacking problem from a one-dimensional vertical stacking to a three-dimensional interlocking arrangement. The frame sections extend in multiple directions and interlock with adjacent carts, creating a stable stacked configuration that achieves narrow stacking distances through spatial optimization rather than simple vertical stacking.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Volume of moving object

If the lower storage device is designed to accommodate two crates, then the cargo capacity is improved, but the space requirement for loading and unloading increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelower storage device capacityVSAvoidloading and unloading convenience
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The lower storage device is positioned and oriented so that its top surface aligns with the adjacent ground or loading surface, creating an equipotential interface that eliminates the need for lifting crates vertically. The sloping rearward configuration of the lower storage device sections facilitates smooth rolling of crates onto and off the storage platform.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #12Equipotentiality

Solution Approach 2:

The lower storage device sections are designed with sloping, curved surfaces that facilitate the rolling motion of crates. The rearward slope creates a gradual transition zone that makes it easier to load and unload crates by reducing the vertical height difference and providing a smooth rolling path.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

Data Source

PatentEP3357787B1Shopping cart stackable with equal or similar carts
Publication Date: 2019.12.18 SOGOMONYAN ZAVEN
  • EP3357787B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3357787B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A stackable shopping cart (1) has a lower (12) and an upper frame element (13), wherein both frame elements (12, 13) are bent downwards on both longitudinal sides (10) and in an area (24) located between the front and rear casters (3, 4), wherein the chassis (2) has a support device (16) at the rear, which is connected to the lower and upper frame elements (12, 13) and has a support frame (17) on each side, wherein each support frame (17) is equipped with a support means (21) arranged at the top for attaching an upper storage device (5), wherein each support frame (17) further comprises a rear frame section (18) and a front frame section (19) and wherein a cross connecting piece (23) is provided at the rear.The two frame elements form a common bend (27), and a section (28a) of the support surface (28) of the lower support device (6) located between the common bend (27) and a first support point (14) for a lower support device (6) either runs parallel to the upper frame element (13) or is arranged at a steeper angle than the upper frame element (13).