Stackable Container Bayonet Mount Interlocking

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing stackable container systems lack versatility in interlocking mechanisms and portability, as well as efficient sealing and handling options, particularly for storing and mixing ingredients.

Innovation Solution

A stackable container system utilizing a bayonet mount for interlocking containers and lids, with an optional handle featuring a sealing portion for secure attachment, allowing for flexible stacking and easy handling, and optional temperature control and pouring features.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If traditional interlocking mechanisms are used for stackable containers, then stacking functionality is achieved, but versatility in interlocking mechanisms and portability is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveversatility in interlocking mechanismsVSAvoidcomplexity of interlocking system
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The container system employs a universal bayonet mount interface that serves multiple functions: interlocking containers vertically, attaching lids to containers, and connecting handles to containers. This single standardized interface replaces multiple specialized connection mechanisms, achieving versatility without proportionally increasing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The container system is divided into modular components (container body, lid, handle) that can be independently assembled and disassembled using the bayonet mount. This segmentation allows flexible configuration where containers can be stacked without lids, with handles, or both, providing versatility in usage scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Productivity

If containers are designed for compact stacking, then storage efficiency is improved, but portability and handling options are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestorage efficiencyVSAvoidportability and handling
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges the stacking function and carrying function into a single integrated structure. Containers stack vertically for efficient storage, while an optional handle can be attached to the stacked configuration, combining compact storage with portability in one system rather than requiring separate solutions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The handle attachment is dynamic rather than fixed - it can be attached when portability is needed and removed when storage efficiency is the priority. This dynamic reconfiguration allows the same container system to adapt between optimized storage mode and optimized handling mode.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Reliability

If lids are sealed tightly to containers, then sealing efficiency is improved, but ease of opening and handling is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesealing efficiencyVSAvoidease of opening
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The bayonet mount interface acts as an intermediary mechanism between the lid and container. It provides a controlled engagement that achieves reliable sealing through the twisting motion while simultaneously providing a clear mechanical advantage for opening, allowing users to easily overcome the sealing force when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The lid connection transitions from a static tight seal to a dynamic bayonet mount that can be easily engaged and disengaged. The bayonet mechanism maintains secure sealing during storage through its locked position, but allows rapid opening when needed through its designed release mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Ease of operation

If handles are added for portability, then ease of handling is improved, but device complexity and potential sealing issues increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of handlingVSAvoidcomplexity of container system
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The handle uses the same bayonet mount interface as the container-lid connection, eliminating the need for specialized handle attachment mechanisms. This universal interface approach adds handling functionality without proportionally increasing complexity, as the same structural principle is reused.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The handle attachment system is self-contained and self-explanatory, using the intuitive bayonet mount that users already understand from attaching lids. No additional complexity or specialized knowledge is required - the handle simply uses the existing connection protocol of the system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentEP2892814B8Stackable container system
Publication Date: 2018.07.25 RUNWAY BLUE LLC

AI summary

The present invention is directed to a stackable container system that includes containers and lids that are configured to allow any of the lids to be used on any of the containers. The bottom of each container interlocks with the top of each lid to allow the containers to be stacked. A handle may also be included that is configured to attach to any of the lids to form a handle for carrying a stack of the interlocked containers. The stackable container system may also include a storage container, such as a beverage bottle, for storing a stack of interlocked containers. Accordingly, each container can be used to store ingredients that are to be later combined in the storage container for consumption. The lids can be configured to be heated or cooled to provide heating or cooling to contents of the container or to the storage container in general.