Stackable Plate Satellite Design for Launch Volume Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current satellite deployment technologies face challenges in efficiently utilizing launch vehicle capacity due to volume and mass limitations, particularly for CubeSats, which restrict the number of satellites that can be launched and deployed in multiple orbital planes, and do not fully leverage the capabilities of smaller launch vehicles.

Innovation Solution

A satellite and deployer design featuring a structural plate with a thickness smaller than its width, allowing for stacking and distribution of launch loads across multiple satellites, with contact points for secure stacking and deployment, and incorporating a deployer that holds the stack during launch and releases satellites individually in orbit.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If CubeSats are launched as rideshare payloads on large launch vehicles, then the cost per satellite is reduced, but the number of satellites that can be deployed in multiple orbital planes is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of satellites deployedVSAvoiddeployment system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The launch vehicle interface is segmented into multiple independent satellite interfaces, allowing multiple satellites to be launched simultaneously in different orbital planes. Each satellite has its own interface and deployment mechanism, enabling parallel deployment operations without interference.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from deploying satellites in a single orbital plane to multi-orbital-plane deployment by adding the orbital plane dimension to the deployment architecture. This allows satellites to be distributed across multiple inclined orbital planes from a single launch vehicle.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Quantity of substance

If the number of satellites in a constellation is increased to fill launch vehicle capacity, then the economic viability improves, but the volume and mass constraints of CubeSats limit the number of satellites per launch

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of satellitesVSAvoidsatellite volume
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The satellite design is segmented into a modular plate structure that can be stacked with other identical plates. This segmentation allows multiple satellites to be compactly arranged in the launch vehicle payload volume, maximizing the number of satellites per launch.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The satellite uses a thin plate structure with deployable solar panels and antennas. The thin-profile design minimizes the volume occupied during launch, while deployable surfaces provide the necessary functional area in orbit.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

3Ease of manufacture

If CubeSats use a standardized box design, then manufacturing is simplified and costs are reduced, but the ability to distribute satellites across multiple orbital planes is hindered

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing simplicityVSAvoidorbital plane distribution capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The standardized satellite is segmented into a plate design with defined attachment interfaces. These interfaces enable the satellites to be stacked and oriented in different configurations, allowing adaptation to multi-orbital-plane deployment requirements while maintaining manufacturing simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The plate design serves multiple functions: it provides a standardized manufacturing form, enables compact stacking for volume efficiency, and offers configurable orientation for different orbital plane deployments. The universal interface allows the same design to be used across various deployment scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Weight of moving object

If the satellite mass is reduced to fit CubeSat constraints, then more satellites can be launched, but the structural integrity and load distribution capability are compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesatellite massVSAvoidstructural integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of moving objectVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The satellite structure uses composite materials that provide high strength-to-weight ratio. This allows the satellite to maintain structural integrity and load distribution capability while keeping the mass low enough to fit CubeSat constraints and maximize the number of satellites per launch.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Data Source

PatentUS11492147B2Stackable satellite structure and deployment method
Publication Date: 2022.11.08 AEROSPACE CORP
  • US11492147B2 patent drawing
  • US11492147B2 patent drawing
  • US11492147B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An apparatus includes a satellite in the form of a plate having a thickness being smaller than a width of the satellite. The apparatus also includes a plurality of contact points distributed on a face of the satellite, allowing for one or more additional satellites to be stacked upon the satellite.