Stackable Storage Modules for Automated Warehouse Retrieval

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional item storage and retrieval systems in warehouses and distribution centers are inefficient, requiring significant human intervention and resulting in low storage density, high operational costs, and potential for lost items.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of stackable storage modules with automated item movement management systems, which utilize modular, elongate frames with movable carrier devices to vertically and horizontally position storage containers, enabling automated retrieval and placement of items with minimal human assistance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Extent of automation

If conventional shelving units with manual storage and retrieval are used, then human operators can easily access and manage items, but storage density is low and operational costs are high

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomation of storage and retrievalVSAvoidcomplexity of storage system
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The storage system is divided into multiple independent stackable modules, each capable of autonomous operation. Each module contains its own conveyor belt system and control mechanisms, allowing the large system to be broken down into manageable, replaceable units that can be individually maintained and operated.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Multiple storage modules are stacked vertically to form a compact tower structure, with each module nested within the overall framework. This nesting approach maximizes vertical space utilization while maintaining a relatively small footprint, thereby increasing storage density without proportionally increasing the ground area occupied.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

2Quantity of substance

If manual storage and retrieval processes are used, then operational flexibility is maintained, but storage density is low and space utilization is poor

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestorage densityVSAvoidease of item access and retrieval
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The conveyor belts within each module are designed to move dynamically, automatically transporting items between storage locations and access points. This dynamic movement system eliminates the need for manual item handling while maintaining operational flexibility, as the conveyor speed and direction can be adjusted based on storage and retrieval requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The automated conveyor system performs storage and retrieval operations autonomously without requiring human operators to physically access and handle items. The system serves itself by automatically positioning items for storage and retrieving them when needed, thereby increasing storage density while maintaining ease of operation through automation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Productivity

If automated storage systems are implemented, then operational costs and time are reduced, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethroughput of storage and retrievalVSAvoidcomplexity of automated system
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The automated system is segmented into multiple independent modules, each with its own conveyor belt and control system. This segmentation allows for simplified individual module design and manufacturing, while the overall system achieves high throughput through parallel operation of multiple modules. Each module can be independently maintained, reducing downtime and complexity of system-wide maintenance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Each storage module is designed as a universal unit that can perform multiple functions: storing items, retrieving items, and transferring items between levels. The standardized design allows any module to be interchangeably positioned within the stack, providing operational flexibility while simplifying the overall system architecture through repetition of proven, optimized components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Quantity of substance

If vertical stacking of storage modules is used, then storage density is increased, but structural stability and safety become concerns

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestorage capacity per unit areaVSAvoidstability of stacked modules
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The storage system is divided into discrete modular units with standardized connection interfaces. Each module is designed as a self-contained structural unit with integrated support features, allowing vertical stacking while maintaining individual structural integrity. The segmentation into standardized modules facilitates precise alignment and stable inter-module connections.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Multiple storage modules are combined through standardized coupling mechanisms that integrate structural support, alignment, and locking functions. The connection structures merge the individual modules into a unified stable tower, distributing loads across multiple connection points and ensuring overall structural stability while maximizing vertical storage capacity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS10273085B2Item transfer using stackable storage modules
Publication Date: 2019.04.30 AMAZON TECH INC
  • US10273085B2 patent drawing
  • US10273085B2 patent drawing
  • US10273085B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An example process may include receiving a request identifying an action with respect to an item and a modular storage system. The modular storage system may include a plurality of shipping containers accessible from an item transfer facility. The process may also include identifying a particular shipping container of the plurality of shipping containers to fulfill the request. The process may also include identifying, within the particular shipping container, a particular storage module to fulfill the request. The particular storage module may include a particular plurality of storage containers. The process may also include identifying, from among the particular plurality of storage containers, a particular storage container to fulfill the request. The process may also include causing movement of the particular plurality of storage containers to move the particular storage container to an access position.