Stacked Channel MOSFET Gate Thickness for Scaling Reliability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The scaling down of metal oxide semiconductor field effect transistors (MOSFETs) in semiconductor devices leads to deteriorated operating characteristics and reduced reliability.

Innovation Solution

A semiconductor device design featuring a gate electrode with varying thickness parts surrounding channel structures of different heights, including a thicker lower part and thinner upper part, connected by channel structures with varying numbers of semiconductor patterns, to enhance electrical properties and reliability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If MOSFET sizes are scaled down to increase integration, then device density increases, but operating characteristics deteriorate and reliability decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice integration densityVSAvoidtransistor operating reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from planar 2D channel structures to three-dimensional vertically-stacked channel structures. Multiple channel structures are stacked vertically above the substrate, enabling increased device density without further lateral scaling. This vertical dimensionality change allows maintaining transistor performance while achieving higher integration density.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The gate electrode is divided into multiple discrete gate electrodes, each controlling a separate channel structure. This segmentation allows independent optimization of each transistor's electrical characteristics and enables selective gating control, improving overall device reliability while maintaining high density.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Ease of operation

If gate electrode thickness is increased to improve transistor control, then switching capability improves, but power consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransistor switching capabilityVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

Different gate electrode portions have different thicknesses optimized for their specific functions. The gate electrode adjacent to the substrate has greater thickness for strong control, while upper gate portions have reduced thickness. This local quality variation maintains effective switching control while minimizing overall power consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The gate electrode structure is asymmetric with varying thickness throughout its height. The thicker lower portion provides strong electrostatic control for switching, while the thinner upper portion reduces parasitic capacitance and power consumption. This asymmetric design optimizes both switching capability and energy efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Data Source

PatentUS12543301B2Semiconductor device
Publication Date: 2026.02.03 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD
  • US12543301B2 patent drawing
  • US12543301B2 patent drawing
  • US12543301B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A semiconductor device comprises an active pattern on a substrate, a pair of first source/drain patterns on the active pattern, a pair of second source/drain patterns on top surfaces of the first source/drain patterns, a gate electrode extending across the active pattern and having sidewalls that face the first and second source/drain patterns, a first channel structure extending across the gate electrode and connecting the first source/drain patterns, and a second channel structure extending across the gate electrode and connecting the second source/drain patterns. The gate electrode includes a first lower part between a bottom surface of the first channel structure and a top surface of the active pattern, and a first upper part between a top surface of the first channel structure and a bottom surface of the second channel structure. The first lower part has a thickness greater than that of the first upper part.