Stacked GAA Transistor Vt Patterning With Spin-On Dummy Mask

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Challenges arise in fabricating gate structures for gate-all-around (GAA) devices and stacked complementary field effect transistors (C-FET) due to increased complexity and degradation of device performance during the scaling process, which affects process control and device reliability.

Innovation Solution

The method involves depositing a dummy material, such as a carbon-based dielectric, using spin-on deposition to form a uniform layer within openings in the device structure, which is then etched back to mask specific regions, allowing for precise control of transistor characteristics and optimizing the stacking process of transistors with different threshold voltages.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If GAA devices are scaled down to increase device density, then productivity and cost efficiency are improved, but manufacturing complexity increases and device performance degrades

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice densityVSAvoidprocessing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The fabrication process is divided into separate loops: a first fabrication loop forms the lower transistor with its gate structure, and a second fabrication loop forms the upper transistor with its gate structure. This segmentation allows each transistor to be independently optimized and fabricated, reducing overall manufacturing complexity while maintaining high device density.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A dummy gate structure is formed in advance over the channel region before the actual gate structures are created. This preliminary structure serves as a template and protection layer during subsequent processing steps, simplifying the fabrication of the final gate-all-around structures while enabling aggressive scaling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Productivity

If GAA devices are scaled down to increase device density, then productivity is improved, but device performance deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice densityVSAvoiddevice performance
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The method enables different gate structures to be formed for upper and lower transistors within the same stacked device. The lower transistor can have a gate structure optimized for one type of operation while the upper transistor has a gate structure optimized for another type, allowing each transistor to maintain high performance despite overall device scaling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The fabrication process allows for changing gate structure parameters between the first and second transistors. Different gate materials, thicknesses, or configurations can be implemented in each transistor to optimize performance characteristics while maintaining compatibility with scaled device dimensions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If stacked C-FET structures are used to increase device density, then productivity is improved, but manufacturing precision requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice densityVSAvoidprocess control
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The stacked C-FET device is fabricated in separate loops where the first transistor and second transistor are formed independently. This segmentation relaxes manufacturing precision requirements by allowing each transistor to be optimized separately rather than requiring perfect symmetry and matching in a single monolithic structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of forming a single symmetric gate structure for both transistors, the method inverts the conventional approach by forming different gate structures for the upper and lower transistors. This inversion allows each transistor to be tailored for its specific function (n-type or p-type), improving performance while reducing the stringency of manufacturing precision requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enhances the flexibility and reliability of transistor performance by enabling tailored threshold voltage control and improved process control, leading to optimized device characteristics in stacked transistor configurations.

Implementation Method 1

depositing a dummy material, such as a carbon-based dielectric, using spin-on deposition to form a uniform layer within openings in the device structure

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpin-on deposition: Spin Coating

Implementation Method 2

which is then etched back to mask specific regions

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEtching:

Data Source

PatentUS20250351547A1Semiconductor Device and Method of Fabricating Thereof
Publication Date: 2025.11.13 TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING CO LTD
  • US20250351547A1 patent drawing
  • US20250351547A1 patent drawing
  • US20250351547A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods for forming a stacked transistor device including depositing a dummy material such as by spin-on deposition to process a first transistor differently than a second transistor of the stacked transistor device. Multi-Vt patterning, where different transistors in a stacked device can have different threshold voltages (Vt) can be implemented by depositing a dummy material before patterning to selectively control the Vt of each transistor without affecting the others. In top-bottom FET stacks, by depositing a dummy material, the process can be optimized to ensure that each transistor in the stack is formed with the desired characteristics.