Stacked Inductor Layout for Smaller Footprint and Lower Interference

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional 8-shaped inductors occupy larger areas, which hinders the miniaturization of electronic devices and does not effectively reduce signal interference between wires.

Innovation Solution

The inductor device employs a stacked structure with sub-wires on different layers, where the first and second sub-wires are wound in opposite directions, reducing the overall area and minimizing signal interference.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If conventional 8-shaped inductor structure is used, then signal interference between wires is reduced, but the occupied area increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesignal interferenceVSAvoidoccupied area
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from a planar 8-shaped inductor to a three-dimensional stacked structure with sub-wires arranged on multiple layers (first layer, second layer, third layer). This vertical stacking in the Z-dimension reduces the horizontal footprint while maintaining the interference-reducing topology through alternating current directions in different layers

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The inductor is segmented into multiple sub-wires (first sub-wire, second sub-wire, third sub-wire, fourth sub-wire) distributed across different layers. Each sub-wire carries current in a specific direction, and their segmented arrangement in space allows for reduced mutual interference while compact packaging

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Area of stationary object

If stacked structure is adopted, then occupied area is reduced, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoccupied areaVSAvoidstructure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a nested hierarchical structure where sub-wires are organized within layers, layers are stacked vertically, and connection elements interconnect across layers. This nested arrangement achieves compact three-dimensional integration while providing a systematic framework that manages complexity through structured organization

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The stacked structure reduces the inductor's area by 35.9% compared to conventional designs and efficiently decreases signal interference while maintaining similar inductance and quality factor performance.

Implementation Method 1

The first sub-wire and the second sub-wire are located on different layers. The third sub-wire and the fourth sub-wire are located on different layers

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic field: Magnetic Field

Data Source

PatentUS20230282407A1Inductor
Publication Date: 2023.09.07 REALTEK SEMICON CORP
  • US20230282407A1 patent drawing
  • US20230282407A1 patent drawing
  • US20230282407A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An inductor device includes a first wire and a second wire. The first wire includes a first sub-wire and a second sub-wire. The first sub-wire is disposed in a first area. The second sub-wire is disposed in a second area, and the first sub-wire and the second sub-wire are located on different layers. The second wire includes a third sub-wire and a fourth sub-wire. The third sub-wire is disposed in the second area, and located below the second sub-wire. The fourth sub-wire is disposed in the first area, the third sub-wire and the fourth sub-wire are located on different layers, and the fourth sub-wire is located above the first sub-wire.