Stacked Layer Structure for Local Bending Peel Resistance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Flexible display devices face issues with peeling between layers when subjected to repeated local bending, despite passing conventional U-shaped bending tests, as stress concentrates at local bent portions.

Innovation Solution

A stacked body design with a second layer having a recovery at its cross-section of 10% or more, measured by nanoindentation, to prevent peeling between layers during local bending.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional U-shaped bending test is used to evaluate bending resistance, then the stacked body passes the test with good bending resistance, but peeling between layers occurs when local bending is applied repeatedly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebending resistanceVSAvoidlayer adhesion
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by specifying that the second layer must have a recovery of 10% or more at its cross-section, creating a localized property requirement that directly addresses the peeling issue at bent portions while allowing other parts of the stacked body to maintain their original characteristics

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter of recovery (elasticity) of the second layer to 10% or more, which fundamentally alters the mechanical behavior of the adhesive layer to prevent peeling under local bending conditions that conventional tests fail to detect

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If the stacked body is designed for flexibility, then it can be bent for foldable displays, but stress concentrates at local bent portions causing peeling

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveflexibilityVSAvoidresistance to peeling
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by specifying that the second layer must have a recovery of 10% or more at its cross-section, creating a localized property requirement that directly addresses the peeling issue at bent portions while allowing other parts of the stacked body to maintain their original characteristics

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses composite materials by combining multiple layers with different properties (first layer, second layer with high recovery, third layer) to achieve both flexibility and peeling resistance, where the composite structure compensates for the weaknesses of individual layers

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The design provides enhanced bending resistance by minimizing peeling between layers, even under localized stress, ensuring durability in flexible displays.

Implementation Method 1

a recovery at a cross-section of the second layer, according to a nanoindentation method, is 10% or more

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElastic recovery: Elastic Recovery

Data Source

PatentUS20260013059A1Stacked body, display device and member for stacked body
Publication Date: 2026.01.08 DAI NIPPON PRINTING CO LTD
  • US20260013059A1 patent drawing
  • US20260013059A1 patent drawing
  • US20260013059A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure provides a stacked body comprising a first layer, a second layer, and a third layer in this order, wherein a recovery at a cross-section of the second layer, according to a nanoindentation method, is 10% or more.