Stacked Loop Antenna Zigzag Configuration

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing wireless communication devices, particularly those using the IEEE 802.15.4 standard, face challenges in reducing size and cost while maintaining effective antenna performance, as they require larger antenna systems that increase manufacturing costs and complexity.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of compact loop antennas stacked on a substrate, with transmit and receive loop elements disposed in zigzag configurations to minimize area and reduce electrical coupling, allowing for a smaller form factor and efficient radiation patterns without the need for additional components like baluns or RF switches.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Volume of moving object

If traditional antenna systems are used in wireless communication devices, then antenna performance can be maintained, but device size and manufacturing cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice sizeVSAvoidantenna performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements nested stacking of multiple loop antennas (transmit and receive antennas) vertically on a single substrate. The antennas are positioned at different heights (e.g., first antenna at 0.125 inches, second antenna at 0.250 inches) to minimize mutual coupling while maintaining compact form factor. This nesting approach allows multiple antenna functions to coexist in a small volume without significant performance degradation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from planar antenna layouts to three-dimensional stacked configurations. By utilizing the vertical dimension (z-axis) rather than only horizontal space, the system accommodates multiple antennas within a compact footprint. The substrate supports antennas at different vertical levels, effectively using spatial dimensionality to reduce overall device volume while maintaining antenna performance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Area of stationary object

If antenna size is reduced to decrease device footprint, then device complexity increases due to need for additional components

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveantenna areaVSAvoidcomponent quantity
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines transmit and receive antenna functions into a single integrated substrate structure. Multiple loop antennas are fabricated on the same substrate using conformal coating techniques, eliminating the need for separate antenna assemblies, baluns, and RF switches. This merging of functions reduces both the physical area required and the overall device complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The substrate serves multiple functions simultaneously: it provides mechanical support, electrical insulation, and a platform for fabricating multiple antenna elements. The conformal coating process enables the substrate to support both transmit and receive antennas with different ground plane configurations, making the single substrate universal for multiple antenna functions without requiring additional specialized components

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Volume of moving object

If multiple antennas are stacked closely to reduce size, then electrical coupling between antennas increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveantenna system volumeVSAvoidelectrical coupling
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies different ground plane configurations to different antenna elements based on their specific functional requirements. The first loop antenna has a first ground plane, while the second loop antenna has a second ground plane with different dimensions and positioning. This localized differentiation optimizes each antenna's radiation pattern and minimizes mutual coupling, allowing close stacking without significant electrical interference

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs asymmetric ground plane designs where the ground planes for transmit and receive antennas have different sizes, shapes, and positions relative to their respective antennas. This asymmetry disrupts the symmetry of electromagnetic coupling paths, reducing mutual coupling effects and allowing the antennas to be positioned closer together while maintaining performance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration results in a smaller, cost-effective transceiver device with improved antenna gain and radiation efficiency, reducing manufacturing costs and facilitating easier integration into devices while maintaining performance.

Implementation Method 1

a first loop element... configured to radiate signals in an omnidirectional radiation pattern... a second loop element... configured to radiate signals in a bidirectional radiation pattern

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic radiation: Electromagnetic Induction

Data Source

PatentUS7456798B2Stacked loop antenna
Publication Date: 2008.11.25 NXP USA INC
  • US7456798B2 patent drawing
  • US7456798B2 patent drawing
  • US7456798B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A small transceiver device and antenna system has an insulating layer with first and second surfaces. A transmit loop element having transmit loop segments is formed on the first surface. The transmit loop segments are disposed in a transmit zigzag configuration. A receive loop element having receive loop segments is formed on the second surface. The receive loop segments are disposed in a receive zigzag configuration. Each receive loop segment in the receive zigzag configuration is skewed with respect to a closest transmit loop segment disposed in the transmit zigzag configuration. The transmit loop segments can be grouped in two or more transmit zigzag configurations, and the receive loop segments can be grouped in two or more receive zigzag configurations.