Stacked Radiator Channel Layout for Lower Pressure Drop

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional radiator assemblies experience increased pressure drop due to aligned fin orientations in stacked radiators, leading to reduced airflow and degraded cooling performance.

Innovation Solution

The radiator apparatus features stacked radiators with alternating channel orientations and optional gaps between adjacent radiators, allowing airflow to change direction and reduce pressure drop.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Area of stationary object

If radiators are stacked together with aligned fin orientations to increase heat transfer area, then the heat transfer area is improved, but the pressure drop increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveheat transfer areaVSAvoidpressure drop
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSStress or pressure

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies asymmetry by alternating the fin orientations between adjacent radiators in the stack. While each individual radiator maintains symmetric fin design, the relative orientation between stacked radiators is asymmetric (alternating directions), which disrupts the cumulative pressure drop effect while preserving total heat transfer area.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a new dimension of orientation variation in the vertical stacking direction. Instead of maintaining uniform fin orientation across all radiators, the system varies the orientation angle along the vertical axis, creating a three-dimensional flow pattern that reduces pressure accumulation while maintaining effective heat transfer surface area.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Area of stationary object

If radiators are stacked together with aligned fin orientations to increase heat transfer area, then the heat transfer area is improved, but the airflow is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveheat transfer areaVSAvoidairflow
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

By alternating fin orientations in adjacent radiators, the system creates asymmetric airflow paths that prevent flow stagnation and maintain consistent airflow velocity through the entire radiator stack, thereby preserving productivity while maximizing heat transfer area.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

The alternating orientation pattern introduces vertical dimension variation to the airflow path, creating a more complex three-dimensional flow pattern that enhances air distribution across all radiators in the stack, preventing bypass flows and maintaining high productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Area of stationary object

If radiators are stacked together with aligned fin orientations to increase heat transfer area, then the heat transfer area is improved, but the cooling performance is degraded

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveheat transfer areaVSAvoidcooling performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The alternating fin orientation pattern creates asymmetric thermal flow paths that prevent hot spots and ensure uniform heat distribution across all radiators in the stack, thereby maintaining reliable cooling performance while maximizing the heat transfer area.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

By varying fin orientations along the vertical dimension, the system creates multi-directional heat transfer paths that enhance thermal efficiency and ensure consistent cooling performance across the entire radiator assembly, preventing performance degradation despite increased stacking.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration enhances airflow efficiency and cooling performance by minimizing pressure drop and enabling effective heat transfer.

Implementation Method 1

Heat from, for example, a computing system is transferred to the radiator assembly 100 with fluid as a medium. The heat from the fluid is then dissipated through the surface area of the radiator assembly 100 by another fluid, such as forced air, which is often referred to as forced convection or the convective fluid.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectConvection: Convection

Implementation Method 2

The orientations of the channels in adjacent radiators differ such that a direction of the fluid passing through the plurality of radiators changes between adjacent radiators. This configuration enhances airflow efficiency and cooling performance by minimizing pressure drop

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure drop reduction through flow direction change:

Data Source

PatentUS12578147B2Varied flow stacked radiators
Publication Date: 2026.03.17 QUANTA COMPUTER INC
  • US12578147B2 patent drawing
  • US12578147B2 patent drawing
  • US12578147B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A radiator apparatus and a radiator assembly include a plurality of radiators stacked together such that a fluid passing through the radiator apparatus passes through each radiator of the plurality of radiators. Each radiator has fins spanning across a thickness of the radiator. The fins define channels for the fluid to flow through the radiator. The channels have respective orientations in the plurality of radiators. The orientations of the channels in adjacent radiators differ such that a direction of the fluid passing through the plurality of radiators changes between adjacent radiators.