Stacked Image Sensor Readout for Rolling Shutter Continuity

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

3D-stacked image sensors face challenges with rolling shutter discontinuity and difficulties in transmitting digital data due to sub-column parallel readout architectures, which affect image quality and frame rate, especially when windowing is applied.

Innovation Solution

The proposed solution involves a stacked image sensor design where each pixel column is split into sub-columns, with each sub-column connected to a dedicated stage in the control logic tier, allowing for sequential readout and parallel operation of analog-to-digital converters, reducing rolling shutter discontinuity and improving frame rate through efficient digital code transmission.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If sub-column parallel readout architecture is used, then frame rate is improved through increased parallelism, but rolling shutter discontinuity occurs causing image distortion

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveframe rateVSAvoidimage quality
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The pixel array is divided into multiple sub-columns, each with its own dedicated ADC stage. This segmentation allows parallel readout of multiple sub-columns simultaneously, increasing frame rate while maintaining image quality through proper sequencing control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The readout architecture dynamically sequences through sub-columns in a controlled manner, adjusting the readout pattern to avoid rolling shutter discontinuity while maintaining high parallelism for high frame rates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Speed

If sub-column parallel readout with dedicated ADCs per sub-column is used, then readout speed is improved, but device complexity increases due to multiple independent ADCs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereadout speedVSAvoidnumber of ADCs
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple ADC stages are merged into a single shared ADC resource that serves all sub-columns. The ADC is time-multiplexed across different sub-columns, reducing the total number of ADCs while maintaining high readout speed through efficient resource sharing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

A single ADC is designed to serve multiple sub-columns universally through time-multiplexed operation. The same ADC hardware performs conversion for different sub-columns at different times, eliminating the need for dedicated ADCs per sub-column.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Productivity

If more sub-columns are used to increase parallelism, then frame rate is improved, but difficulty in transmitting digital data to periphery increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveframe rateVSAvoiddata transmission complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Digital data from multiple sub-columns is merged into a single transmission path. The ADC output is sequentially or time-multiplexed to a single digital interface, simplifying data transmission to the periphery while maintaining high frame rate through efficient data aggregation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Productivity

If windowing is applied to reduce array resolution, then frame rate is improved, but number of sub-columns and ADCs is reduced which may not be desirable

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveframe rateVSAvoidreadout configuration flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The readout architecture dynamically adapts to windowing configurations by adjusting which sub-columns are activated and how the ADC time-multiplexing is configured. This maintains readout configuration flexibility and adaptability even when windowing is applied to improve frame rate.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentEP3324545B1Image sensor and method for readout of an image sensor
Publication Date: 2024.04.24 AUSTRIAMICROSYSTEMS AG
  • EP3324545B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3324545B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3324545B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4

AI summary

An image sensor is proposed to have a stack with at least a pixel array tier (PXT) and a control logic tier (CLT). The pixel array tier (PXT) comprises an array of pixels which are arranged into pixel columns (n), each pixel column (n) comprising a number of N sub-columns: Each sub-column is denoted by N(n,i) with 1 ≤ i ≤ N. The control logic tier (CLT) comprises an array of analog-to-digital-converters (ADC(m)) which are arranged into ADC columns (m), wherein each analog-to-digital converter (ADC(m)) comprises a number of M stages. Each stage is denoted by M(m,j) with 1 ≤ j ≤ M, Furthermore, each respective sub-column N(n,i) is electrically connected to a dedicated stage M(m,j=i) and the stages M(m,j) are electrically interconnected to form the analog-to-digital converters (ADC(m)), respectively. The control logic tier (CLT) is arranged to sequentially read out the sub-columns N(n,i), wherein the stages M(m,j=i) dedicated to the sub-columns N(n,i) are arranged as input stages to sequentially receive signal levels of the pixels in the sub-columns N(n,i), respectively. The input stages are arranged to perform on the sequentially received signal levels a coarse first analog-to-digital conversion. The remaining stages M(m,j≠i) are arranged to sequentially perform finer analog-to-digital conversions of the received signal levels.