Stacking Ring Design for Box-Free Chair Base Shipping

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing method of shipping chair bases in cardboard boxes is inefficient due to excessive space usage, added weight, and waste generation, while providing inadequate protection against damage.

Innovation Solution

A modified chair base design with a hub and radial arms, allowing for stacking without boxes, using flexible material wrapping and optional stacking rings to secure multiple bases together, and pallet configurations for stable transport.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If chair bases are shipped in cardboard boxes, then the bases are protected from damage, but the boxes add unnecessary weight and waste to the shipment

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprotection from damageVSAvoidwaste from boxes
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes the cardboard box from the shipping system entirely. Instead of placing chair bases inside boxes for protection, the chair bases themselves are designed with integrated protective features (stacking rings and hub configurations) that eliminate the need for external packaging, thereby eliminating waste while maintaining protection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The chair bases provide their own protection through self-contained structural features. The stacking rings and hub designs are integral parts of the chair bases that protect them during shipping without requiring external protective materials, making the protection system self-sufficient and waste-free.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If chair bases are shipped in cardboard boxes, then the bases are protected from damage, but the boxes add extra weight to the shipment

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprotection from damageVSAvoidweight of boxes
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and eliminates the cardboard box component from the shipping system. The protective function previously provided by the box is transferred to integral structural features of the chair base itself (stacking rings and hub configurations), removing the unnecessary weight of external packaging.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The chair bases are designed to protect themselves through built-in structural elements rather than relying on external protective packaging. This self-service approach eliminates the weight of boxes while maintaining protection during shipping.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Reliability

If chair bases are shipped in cardboard boxes, then the bases are protected from damage, but there is excessive empty space within the boxes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprotection from damageVSAvoidempty space in boxes
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSVolume of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the protective function with the chair base structure itself. The stacking rings and hub configurations are combined with the chair base design, eliminating the need for separate protective boxes and reducing empty space by making the protective elements integral to the object being protected.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent removes the cardboard box from the system entirely. The protective function that was previously provided by the box is extracted and implemented through the chair base's own structural features, eliminating the volume waste associated with rectangular boxes containing irregularly shaped objects.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Loss of substance

If chair bases are stacked directly without boxes, then waste and weight are reduced, but the bases may shift and fall over during transport

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewaste from boxesVSAvoidstability during transport
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of substanceVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The chair bases provide their own stabilization through built-in stacking rings and hub configurations. These integral structural features enable the bases to stack securely and remain stable during transport without requiring external boxes, making the stabilization system self-contained and waste-free.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a nesting configuration where chair bases stack vertically with the stacking rings fitting into the hub structures. This nested arrangement creates a stable, interlocked stack that prevents shifting and falling during transport, eliminating the need for external boxes while maintaining stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Data Source

PatentUS20250376341A1Stacking ring for chair bases
Publication Date: 2025.12.11 MEDWAY PLASTICS CORP
  • US20250376341A1 patent drawing
  • US20250376341A1 patent drawing
  • US20250376341A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A stacking ring for a chair base may be disposable between a first and second chair base such that the stacking ring generally prevents lateral movement of the first chair base relative to the second chair base. The stacking ring may be integrally formed to the chair base, or separate and disposable between at least two chair bases. The stacking ring may substantially prevent rotation of a first chair base relative to a second chair base.